lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEvqOaEnkWd=C88kkBdCz8s3odWCw5D9io0YL-=8AN-tag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 08:54:21 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com, 
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 06/19] virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for
 virtqueue_add variants

On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 1:47 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 03:31:41PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Those variants are used internally so let's switch to use
> > vring_virtqueue as parameter to be consistent with other internal
> > virtqueue helpers.
> >
> > Acked-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index aadeab66e57c..93c36314b5e7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static unsigned int vring_unmap_one_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> >       return extra->next;
> >  }
> >
> > -static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > +static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> >                                              unsigned int total_sg,
> >                                              gfp_t gfp)
> >  {
> > @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >       return desc;
> >  }
> >
> > -static inline unsigned int virtqueue_add_desc_split(struct virtqueue *vq,
> > +static inline unsigned int virtqueue_add_desc_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> >                                                   struct vring_desc *desc,
> >                                                   struct vring_desc_extra *extra,
> >                                                   unsigned int i,
> > @@ -513,11 +513,12 @@ static inline unsigned int virtqueue_add_desc_split(struct virtqueue *vq,
> >                                                   unsigned int len,
> >                                                   u16 flags, bool premapped)
> >  {
> > +     struct virtio_device *vdev = vq->vq.vdev;
> >       u16 next;
> >
> > -     desc[i].flags = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vdev, flags);
> > -     desc[i].addr = cpu_to_virtio64(vq->vdev, addr);
> > -     desc[i].len = cpu_to_virtio32(vq->vdev, len);
> > +     desc[i].flags = cpu_to_virtio16(vdev, flags);
> > +     desc[i].addr = cpu_to_virtio64(vdev, addr);
> > +     desc[i].len = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, len);
> >
> >       extra[i].addr = premapped ? DMA_MAPPING_ERROR : addr;
> >       extra[i].len = len;
> > @@ -525,12 +526,12 @@ static inline unsigned int virtqueue_add_desc_split(struct virtqueue *vq,
> >
> >       next = extra[i].next;
> >
> > -     desc[i].next = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vdev, next);
> > +     desc[i].next = cpu_to_virtio16(vdev, next);
> >
> >       return next;
> >  }
> >
> > -static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > +static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> >                                     struct scatterlist *sgs[],
> >                                     unsigned int total_sg,
> >                                     unsigned int out_sgs,
> > @@ -540,7 +541,6 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >                                     bool premapped,
> >                                     gfp_t gfp)
> >  {
> > -     struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> >       struct vring_desc_extra *extra;
> >       struct scatterlist *sg;
> >       struct vring_desc *desc;
> > @@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >       head = vq->free_head;
> >
> >       if (virtqueue_use_indirect(vq, total_sg))
> > -             desc = alloc_indirect_split(_vq, total_sg, gfp);
> > +             desc = alloc_indirect_split(vq, total_sg, gfp);
> >       else {
> >               desc = NULL;
> >               WARN_ON_ONCE(total_sg > vq->split.vring.num && !vq->indirect);
> > @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >                       /* Note that we trust indirect descriptor
> >                        * table since it use stream DMA mapping.
> >                        */
> > -                     i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(_vq, desc, extra, i, addr, len,
> > +                     i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(vq, desc, extra, i, addr, len,
> >                                                    VRING_DESC_F_NEXT,
> >                                                    premapped);
> >               }
> > @@ -629,14 +629,14 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >                       /* Note that we trust indirect descriptor
> >                        * table since it use stream DMA mapping.
> >                        */
> > -                     i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(_vq, desc, extra, i, addr, len,
> > +                     i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(vq, desc, extra, i, addr, len,
> >                                                    VRING_DESC_F_NEXT |
> >                                                    VRING_DESC_F_WRITE,
> >                                                    premapped);
> >               }
> >       }
> >       /* Last one doesn't continue. */
> > -     desc[prev].flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> > +     desc[prev].flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> >       if (!indirect && vring_need_unmap_buffer(vq, &extra[prev]))
> >               vq->split.desc_extra[prev & (vq->split.vring.num - 1)].flags &=
> >                       ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> > @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >               if (vring_mapping_error(vq, addr))
> >                       goto unmap_release;
> >
> > -             virtqueue_add_desc_split(_vq, vq->split.vring.desc,
> > +             virtqueue_add_desc_split(vq, vq->split.vring.desc,
> >                                        vq->split.desc_extra,
> >                                        head, addr,
> >                                        total_sg * sizeof(struct vring_desc),
> > @@ -675,13 +675,13 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >       /* Put entry in available array (but don't update avail->idx until they
> >        * do sync). */
> >       avail = vq->split.avail_idx_shadow & (vq->split.vring.num - 1);
> > -     vq->split.vring.avail->ring[avail] = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, head);
> > +     vq->split.vring.avail->ring[avail] = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, head);
> >
> >       /* Descriptors and available array need to be set before we expose the
> >        * new available array entries. */
> >       virtio_wmb(vq->weak_barriers);
> >       vq->split.avail_idx_shadow++;
> > -     vq->split.vring.avail->idx = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
> > +     vq->split.vring.avail->idx = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev,
> >                                               vq->split.avail_idx_shadow);
> >       vq->num_added++;
> >
> > @@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >       /* This is very unlikely, but theoretically possible.  Kick
> >        * just in case. */
> >       if (unlikely(vq->num_added == (1 << 16) - 1))
> > -             virtqueue_kick(_vq);
> > +             virtqueue_kick(&vq->vq);
> >
> >       return 0;
> >
> > @@ -706,7 +706,6 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> >       for (n = 0; n < total_sg; n++) {
> >               if (i == err_idx)
> >                       break;
> > -
> >               i = vring_unmap_one_split(vq, &extra[i]);
> >       }
> >
>
> can't say I like this, error handling is better separated visually from
> good path.

I don't see a connection to this commnet, this patch doesn't touch the
error handling. We can try to optimize the error handling on top.

But I will remove the unnecessary newline change here.

Thanks


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ