[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNGFv-nGZF5chGIb@rotor>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:22:13 -0400
From: Ben Boeckel <me@...boeckel.net>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...nsys.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KEYS/KEYRINGS" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tpm2-sessions: Remove unnecessary wrapper
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 19:43:16 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...nsys.com>
>
> Open code tpm_buf_append_hmac_session_opt() because it adds unnecessary
> disperancy to the call sites (and reduces the amount of code).
^^^^^^^^^^
"discrepancy" as in "difference"? But that doesn't feel like the right
usage either. Perhaps "unnecessary abstraction"? Also, open coding it
reduces the amount of code, so some clarification to not read as
something else that "it" (`tpm_buf_append_hmac_session_opt`) does would
be clearer.
Thanks,
--Ben
Powered by blists - more mailing lists