[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3412715-6d9d-4809-9588-ba08da450d16@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 19:59:00 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
usamaarif642@...il.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, ziy@...dia.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, baohua@...nel.org, voidice@...il.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, cerasuolodomenico@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
kaleshsingh@...gle.com, npache@...hat.com, riel@...riel.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, rppt@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com,
dev.jain@....com, ryncsn@...il.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
surenb@...gle.com, hughd@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
matthew.brost@...el.com, joshua.hahnjy@...il.com, rakie.kim@...com,
byungchul@...com, gourry@...rry.net, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com,
apopple@...dia.com, qun-wei.lin@...iatek.com, Andrew.Yang@...iatek.com,
casper.li@...iatek.com, chinwen.chang@...iatek.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, ioworker0@...il.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/thp: fix MTE tag mismatch when replacing
zero-filled subpages
On 22.09.25 19:24, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 10:14:58AM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
>>
>> When both THP and MTE are enabled, splitting a THP and replacing its
>> zero-filled subpages with the shared zeropage can cause MTE tag mismatch
>> faults in userspace.
>>
>> Remapping zero-filled subpages to the shared zeropage is unsafe, as the
>> zeropage has a fixed tag of zero, which may not match the tag expected by
>> the userspace pointer.
>>
>> KSM already avoids this problem by using memcmp_pages(), which on arm64
>> intentionally reports MTE-tagged pages as non-identical to prevent unsafe
>> merging.
>>
>> As suggested by David[1], this patch adopts the same pattern, replacing the
>> memchr_inv() byte-level check with a call to pages_identical(). This
>> leverages existing architecture-specific logic to determine if a page is
>> truly identical to the shared zeropage.
>>
>> Having both the THP shrinker and KSM rely on pages_identical() makes the
>> design more future-proof, IMO. Instead of handling quirks in generic code,
>> we just let the architecture decide what makes two pages identical.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca2106a3-4bb2-4457-81af-301fd99fbef4@redhat.com
>>
>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>> Reported-by: Qun-wei Lin <Qun-wei.Lin@...iatek.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/a7944523fcc3634607691c35311a5d59d1a3f8d4.camel@mediatek.com
>> Fixes: b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp")
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
>
> Functionally, the patch looks fine, both with and without MTE.
>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>
>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> index 32e0ec2dde36..28d4b02a1aa5 100644
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -4104,29 +4104,20 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
>> static bool thp_underused(struct folio *folio)
>> {
>> int num_zero_pages = 0, num_filled_pages = 0;
>> - void *kaddr;
>> int i;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < folio_nr_pages(folio); i++) {
>> - kaddr = kmap_local_folio(folio, i * PAGE_SIZE);
>> - if (!memchr_inv(kaddr, 0, PAGE_SIZE)) {
>> - num_zero_pages++;
>> - if (num_zero_pages > khugepaged_max_ptes_none) {
>> - kunmap_local(kaddr);
>> + if (pages_identical(folio_page(folio, i), ZERO_PAGE(0))) {
>> + if (++num_zero_pages > khugepaged_max_ptes_none)
>> return true;
>
> I wonder what the overhead of doing a memcmp() vs memchr_inv() is. The
> former will need to read from two places. If it's noticeable, it would
> affect architectures that don't have an MTE equivalent.
>
> Alternatively we could introduce something like folio_has_metadata()
> which on arm64 simply checks PG_mte_tagged.
We discussed something similar in the other thread (I suggested
page_is_mergable()). I'd prefer to use pages_identical() for now, so we
have the same logic here and in ksm code.
(this patch here almost looks like a cleanup :) )
If this becomes a problem, what we could do is in pages_identical()
would be simply doing the memchr_inv() in case is_zero_pfn(). KSM might
benefit from that as well when merging with the shared zeropage through
try_to_merge_with_zero_page().
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists