[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNGR0x185VGHxSde@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 11:13:39 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Add support and tests for FIXUP quirks in
modules
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:41:37AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> I see fixups in controller drivers here:
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-bcma.c
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
>
> Are any of those somehow wrong?
Controller drivers are a special case I guess, but I'd rather still
not open it up to any random driver. When did we allow modular
controller drivers anyway? That feels like a somewhat bad idea, too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists