[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250922165057.70eefc6b@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 16:50:57 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andre Carvalho <asantostc@...il.com>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] netconsole: resume previously
deactivated target
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 22:55:45 +0100 Andre Carvalho wrote:
> + if (nt->state == STATE_DEACTIVATED && event == NETDEV_UP)
> + maybe_resume_target(nt, dev);
This uses GFP_KERNEL
> netconsole_target_put(nt);
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&target_list_lock, flags);
And we're under a spin lock.
This gets hit in the selftest you're adding so please triple check
the kernel config that you're testing with.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists