[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <iom65w7amxqf7miopujxeulyiglhkyjszjc3nd4ivknj5npcz2@bvxej6ymkecd>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 11:51:07 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: chester62515@...il.com, mbrugger@...e.com,
ghennadi.procopciuc@....nxp.com, s32@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, jingoohan1@...il.com,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, Ionut.Vicovan@....com, larisa.grigore@....com,
Ghennadi.Procopciuc@....com, ciprianmarian.costea@....com, bogdan.hamciuc@....com,
Frank.li@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
cassel@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] dt-bindings: PCI: s32g: Add NXP PCIe controller
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 05:58:19PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Describe the PCIe controller available on the S32G platforms.
>
You should mention that this binding is for the controller operating in 'Root
Complex' mode.
> Co-developed-by: Ionut Vicovan <Ionut.Vicovan@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Ionut Vicovan <Ionut.Vicovan@....com>
> Co-developed-by: Bogdan-Gabriel Roman <bogdan-gabriel.roman@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan-Gabriel Roman <bogdan-gabriel.roman@....com>
> Co-developed-by: Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@....com>
> Co-developed-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@....com>
> Co-developed-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....com>
> Co-developed-by: Bogdan Hamciuc <bogdan.hamciuc@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Hamciuc <bogdan.hamciuc@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/nxp,s32-pcie.yaml | 131 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nxp,s32-pcie.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nxp,s32-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nxp,s32-pcie.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cabb8b86c042
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nxp,s32-pcie.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/nxp,s32-pcie.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: NXP S32G2xx/S32G3xx PCIe controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Bogdan Hamciuc <bogdan.hamciuc@....com>
> + - Ionut Vicovan <ionut.vicovan@....com>
> +
> +description:
> + This PCIe controller is based on the Synopsys DesignWare PCIe IP.
> + The S32G SoC family has two PCIe controllers, which can be configured as
> + either Root Complex or Endpoint.
> +
But this binding is going to cover only the 'Root Complex' mode, isn't it?
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + oneOf:
> + - enum:
> + - nxp,s32g2-pcie # S32G2 SoCs RC mode
> + - items:
> + - const: nxp,s32g3-pcie
> + - const: nxp,s32g2-pcie
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 7
> +
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: dbi
> + - const: dbi2
> + - const: atu
> + - const: dma
> + - const: ctrl
> + - const: config
> + - const: addr_space
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 8
> +
> + interrupt-names:
> + items:
> + - const: link-req-stat
> + - const: dma
> + - const: msi
> + - const: phy-link-down
> + - const: phy-link-up
> + - const: misc
> + - const: pcs
> + - const: tlp-req-no-comp
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - reg-names
> + - interrupts
> + - interrupt-names
> + - ranges
> + - phys
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: /schemas/pci/snps,dw-pcie-common.yaml#
> + - $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-bus.yaml#
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/phy/phy.h>
> +
> + bus {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + pcie@...00000 {
> + compatible = "nxp,s32g3-pcie",
> + "nxp,s32g2-pcie";
> + reg = <0x00 0x40400000 0x0 0x00001000>, /* dbi registers */
> + <0x00 0x40420000 0x0 0x00001000>, /* dbi2 registers */
> + <0x00 0x40460000 0x0 0x00001000>, /* atu registers */
> + <0x00 0x40470000 0x0 0x00001000>, /* dma registers */
> + <0x00 0x40481000 0x0 0x000000f8>, /* ctrl registers */
> + /*
> + * RC configuration space, 4KB each for cfg0 and cfg1
> + * at the end of the outbound memory map
> + */
> + <0x5f 0xffffe000 0x0 0x00002000>,
> + <0x58 0x00000000 0x0 0x40000000>; /* 1GB EP addr space */
> + reg-names = "dbi", "dbi2", "atu", "dma", "ctrl",
> + "config", "addr_space";
> + dma-coherent;
> + #address-cells = <3>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + device_type = "pci";
> + ranges =
> + /*
> + * downstream I/O, 64KB and aligned naturally just
> + * before the config space to minimize fragmentation
> + */
> + <0x81000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x5f 0xfffe0000 0x0 0x00010000>,
s/0x81000000/0x01000000
since the 'relocatable' is irrelevant.
> + /*
> + * non-prefetchable memory, with best case size and
> + * alignment
> + */
> + <0x82000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x58 0x00000000 0x7 0xfffe0000>;
s/0x82000000/0x02000000
And the PCI address really starts from 0x00000000? I don't think so.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists