linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND][PATCH v15 0/4] perf: Support the deferred unwinding infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250922072307.GQ4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:23:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
	"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@....org>,
	Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
	Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Sam James <sam@...too.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Carlos O'Donell <codonell@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH v15 0/4] perf: Support the deferred unwinding
 infrastructure

On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 04:34:02PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 03:10:18PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:32:20 +0200
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Now, task_work_run() is in the exit_to_user_mode_loop() which is notably
> > > > *before* exit_to_user_mode() which does the unwind_reset_info().
> > > > 
> > > > What happens if we get an NMI requesting an unwind after
> > > > unwind_reset_info() while still very much being in the kernel on the way
> > > > out?  
> > > 
> > > AFAICT it will try and do a task_work_add(TWA_RESUME) from NMI context,
> > > and this will fail horribly.
> > > 
> > > If you do something like:
> > > 
> > > 	twa_mode = in_nmi() ? TWA_NMI_CURRENT : TWA_RESUME;
> > > 	task_work_add(foo, twa_mode);
> > > 
> > > it might actually work.
> > 
> > Ah, the comment for TWA_RESUME didn't express this restriction.
> > 
> > That does look like that would work as the way I expected task_work to
> > handle this case.
> 
> BTW, I remember Peter had a fix for TWA_NMI_CURRENT, I guess it got lost
> in the shuffle or did something else happen in the meantime?
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/20250122124228.GO7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net

Oh, yeah, I had completely forgotten about all that :-)

I'll go stick it in the pile. Thanks!