[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <835caf4a-0218-4f02-8459-e11757d36e51@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 10:20:28 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>, hannes@...xchg.org,
hughd@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, muchun.song@...ux.dev, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
ziy@...dia.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
npache@...hat.com, ryan.roberts@....com, dev.jain@....com,
baohua@...nel.org, lance.yang@...ux.dev, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: thp: introduce folio_split_queue_lock and its
variants
On 19.09.25 05:46, Qi Zheng wrote:
> From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>
> In future memcg removal, the binding between a folio and a memcg may
> change, making the split lock within the memcg unstable when held.
>
> A new approach is required to reparent the split queue to its parent. This
> patch starts introducing a unified way to acquire the split lock for
> future work.
>
> It's a code-only refactoring with no functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> ---
Looks sane, I assume the build issue is easily fixed
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists