[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250922103442.GM5333@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 12:34:42 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@...ola.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, clm@...com, dsterba@...e.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: Prevent open-coded arithmetic on kmalloc
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 04:58:14PM +0200, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
> The second patch is a small cleanup after fixing up my first patch, in
> which I realized that the __free(kfree) attribute would come in handy in a
> couple of particularly large functions with multiple exit points. This
> second patch is probably more of a cosmetic thing, and it's not an
> exhaustive exercise by any means. All of this to say that even if I feel
> like it should be included, I don't mind if it has to be dropped.
Yes there are many candidates for the __free() cleanup annotation and
we'll want to fix them all systematically. We already have the automatic
cleaning for struct btrfs_path (BTRFS_PATH_AUTO_FREE). For the
kfree/kvfree I'd like to something similar:
#define AUTO_KFREE(name) *name __free(kfree) = NULL
#define AUTO_KVFREE(name) *name __free(kvfree) = NULL
This wraps the name and initializes it to NULL so it's not accidentally
forgotten.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists