linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-x86 tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aNE1s02dSgcJ4Uxq@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:40:35 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Aithal, Srikanth" <sraithal@....com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-x86 tree with the tip tree

On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 04:57:39PM +0530, Aithal, Srikanth wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Todays linux-next build fails with below error on AMD x86:
> 
> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:4091:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘F’
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>  4091 |         F(DstMem | SrcNone | Lock,              em_inc),
>       |         ^

That'll be me doing a mismerge I expect and should've taken the other
side of the merge for these, I'm quite surprised that the x86
allmodconfig builds didn't trip this up :( 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)