[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250923160853.1925674-1-heiko@sntech.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:08:49 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: lee@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
heiko@...ech.de
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Improve error handling for qnap-mcu transfers
Digging deeper into how that MCU behaves, I found out it can return
more status codes than the "@0" for "ok".
The additional codes can report a failed checksum verification and
some "general" error for the command execution.
This also explains sporadic command timeout messages, I have seen
over time, when the controller sends an error code while we expect
a longer reply from it.
So while I'm not sure yet why it reports an error, with these changes
we at least handle the error return code in a meaningful way.
Heiko Stuebner (4):
mfd: qnap-mcu: Calculate the checksum on the actual number of bytes
received
mfd: qnap-mcu: Use EPROTO in stead of EIO on checksum errors
mfd: qnap-mcu: Move checksum verification to its own function
mfd: qnap-mcu: Add proper error handling for command errors
drivers/mfd/qnap-mcu.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists