lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <sb6o4y5ymss3ko73ruwsdgr2dnv2etbg6zq5muaw2vyhlm52bc@zl4uswmomakz>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 21:50:55 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>, 
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, 
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, 
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, 
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, 
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, 
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Add support and tests for FIXUP quirks in
 modules

On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 11:13:39AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:41:37AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > I see fixups in controller drivers here:
> > 
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c
> > drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-bcma.c
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> > 
> > Are any of those somehow wrong?
> 
> When did we allow modular
> controller drivers anyway?  That feels like a somewhat bad idea, too.
> 

Why not? We currently only restrict the controller drivers implementing the
irqchip controller from being *removed* because of the IRQ disposal concern.
Other than that, I don't see why kernel should restrict building them as
modules.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ