lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250923122147-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 12:23:56 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@...dortmund.de>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
	eperezma@...hat.com, stephen@...workplumber.org, leiyang@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@...dortmund.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/8] TUN & TAP: Provide
 ptr_ring_consume_batched wrappers for vhost_net

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:15:50AM +0200, Simon Schippers wrote:
> The wrappers tun_ring_consume_batched/tap_ring_consume_batched are similar
> to the wrappers tun_ring_consume/tap_ring_consume. They deal with
> consuming a batch of entries of the ptr_ring and then waking the
> netdev queue whenever entries get invalidated to be used again by the
> producer.
> To avoid waking the netdev queue when the ptr_ring is full, it is checked
> if the netdev queue is stopped before invalidating entries. Like that the
> netdev queue can be safely woken after invalidating entries.
> 
> The READ_ONCE in __ptr_ring_peek, paired with the smp_wmb() in
> __ptr_ring_produce within tun_net_xmit guarantees that the information
> about the netdev queue being stopped is visible after __ptr_ring_peek is
> called.

READ_ONCE generally can't pair with smp_wmb


>From Documentation/memory-barriers.txt


SMP BARRIER PAIRING
-------------------
                                 
When dealing with CPU-CPU interactions, certain types of memory barrier should
always be paired.  A lack of appropriate pairing is almost certainly an error.


....


A write barrier pairs
with an address-dependency barrier, a control dependency, an acquire barrier,
a release barrier, a read barrier, or a general barrier.




> Co-developed-by: Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@...dortmund.de>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@...dortmund.de>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@...dortmund.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/tap.c      | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/tun.c      | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/if_tap.h |  6 +++++
>  include/linux/if_tun.h |  7 ++++++
>  4 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
> index f8292721a9d6..651d48612329 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
> @@ -1216,6 +1216,58 @@ struct socket *tap_get_socket(struct file *file)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tap_get_socket);
>  
> +int tap_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file,
> +			     void **array, int n)
> +{
> +	struct tap_queue *q = file->private_data;
> +	struct netdev_queue *txq;
> +	struct net_device *dev;
> +	bool will_invalidate;
> +	bool stopped;
> +	void *ptr;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&q->ring.consumer_lock);
> +	ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&q->ring);
> +
> +	if (!ptr) {
> +		spin_unlock(&q->ring.consumer_lock);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	i = 0;
> +	do {
> +		/* Check if the queue stopped before zeroing out, so no
> +		 * ptr get produced in the meantime, because this could
> +		 * result in waking even though the ptr_ring is full.
> +		 * The order of the operations is ensured by barrier().
> +		 */
> +		will_invalidate = __ptr_ring_will_invalidate(&q->ring);
> +		if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> +			rcu_read_lock();
> +			dev = rcu_dereference(q->tap)->dev;
> +			txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, q->queue_index);
> +			stopped = netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq);
> +		}
> +		barrier();
> +		__ptr_ring_discard_one(&q->ring, will_invalidate);
> +
> +		if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> +			if (stopped)
> +				netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +		}
> +
> +		array[i++] = ptr;
> +		if (i >= n)
> +			break;
> +	} while ((ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&q->ring)));
> +	spin_unlock(&q->ring.consumer_lock);
> +
> +	return i;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tap_ring_consume_batched);
> +
>  struct ptr_ring *tap_get_ptr_ring(struct file *file)
>  {
>  	struct tap_queue *q;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 682df8157b55..7566b22780fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -3759,6 +3759,60 @@ struct socket *tun_get_socket(struct file *file)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tun_get_socket);
>  
> +int tun_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file,
> +			     void **array, int n)
> +{
> +	struct tun_file *tfile = file->private_data;
> +	struct netdev_queue *txq;
> +	struct net_device *dev;
> +	bool will_invalidate;
> +	bool stopped;
> +	void *ptr;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> +	ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&tfile->tx_ring);
> +
> +	if (!ptr) {
> +		spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	i = 0;
> +	do {
> +		/* Check if the queue stopped before zeroing out, so no
> +		 * ptr get produced in the meantime, because this could
> +		 * result in waking even though the ptr_ring is full.
> +		 * The order of the operations is ensured by barrier().
> +		 */
> +		will_invalidate =
> +			__ptr_ring_will_invalidate(&tfile->tx_ring);
> +		if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> +			rcu_read_lock();
> +			dev = rcu_dereference(tfile->tun)->dev;
> +			txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev,
> +						  tfile->queue_index);
> +			stopped = netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq);
> +		}
> +		barrier();
> +		__ptr_ring_discard_one(&tfile->tx_ring, will_invalidate);
> +
> +		if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> +			if (stopped)
> +				netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +		}
> +
> +		array[i++] = ptr;
> +		if (i >= n)
> +			break;
> +	} while ((ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&tfile->tx_ring)));
> +	spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> +
> +	return i;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tun_ring_consume_batched);
> +
>  struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *file)
>  {
>  	struct tun_file *tfile;
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_tap.h b/include/linux/if_tap.h
> index 553552fa635c..2e5542d6aef4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_tap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_tap.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ struct socket;
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TAP)
>  struct socket *tap_get_socket(struct file *);
>  struct ptr_ring *tap_get_ptr_ring(struct file *file);
> +int tap_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file, void **array, int n);
>  #else
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
> @@ -22,6 +23,11 @@ static inline struct ptr_ring *tap_get_ptr_ring(struct file *f)
>  {
>  	return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  }
> +static inline int tap_ring_consume_batched(struct file *f,
> +						void **array, int n)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_TAP */
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_tun.h b/include/linux/if_tun.h
> index 80166eb62f41..5b41525ac007 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_tun.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_tun.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct tun_msg_ctl {
>  #if defined(CONFIG_TUN) || defined(CONFIG_TUN_MODULE)
>  struct socket *tun_get_socket(struct file *);
>  struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *file);
> +int tun_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file, void **array, int n);
>  
>  static inline bool tun_is_xdp_frame(void *ptr)
>  {
> @@ -55,6 +56,12 @@ static inline struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *f)
>  	return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  }
>  
> +static inline int tun_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file,
> +						void **array, int n)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool tun_is_xdp_frame(void *ptr)
>  {
>  	return false;
> -- 
> 2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ