[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250923122147-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 12:23:56 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@...dortmund.de>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
eperezma@...hat.com, stephen@...workplumber.org, leiyang@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@...dortmund.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/8] TUN & TAP: Provide
ptr_ring_consume_batched wrappers for vhost_net
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:15:50AM +0200, Simon Schippers wrote:
> The wrappers tun_ring_consume_batched/tap_ring_consume_batched are similar
> to the wrappers tun_ring_consume/tap_ring_consume. They deal with
> consuming a batch of entries of the ptr_ring and then waking the
> netdev queue whenever entries get invalidated to be used again by the
> producer.
> To avoid waking the netdev queue when the ptr_ring is full, it is checked
> if the netdev queue is stopped before invalidating entries. Like that the
> netdev queue can be safely woken after invalidating entries.
>
> The READ_ONCE in __ptr_ring_peek, paired with the smp_wmb() in
> __ptr_ring_produce within tun_net_xmit guarantees that the information
> about the netdev queue being stopped is visible after __ptr_ring_peek is
> called.
READ_ONCE generally can't pair with smp_wmb
>From Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
SMP BARRIER PAIRING
-------------------
When dealing with CPU-CPU interactions, certain types of memory barrier should
always be paired. A lack of appropriate pairing is almost certainly an error.
....
A write barrier pairs
with an address-dependency barrier, a control dependency, an acquire barrier,
a release barrier, a read barrier, or a general barrier.
> Co-developed-by: Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@...dortmund.de>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@...dortmund.de>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@...dortmund.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/tap.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/tun.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/if_tap.h | 6 +++++
> include/linux/if_tun.h | 7 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
> index f8292721a9d6..651d48612329 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
> @@ -1216,6 +1216,58 @@ struct socket *tap_get_socket(struct file *file)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tap_get_socket);
>
> +int tap_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + struct tap_queue *q = file->private_data;
> + struct netdev_queue *txq;
> + struct net_device *dev;
> + bool will_invalidate;
> + bool stopped;
> + void *ptr;
> + int i;
> +
> + spin_lock(&q->ring.consumer_lock);
> + ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&q->ring);
> +
> + if (!ptr) {
> + spin_unlock(&q->ring.consumer_lock);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + i = 0;
> + do {
> + /* Check if the queue stopped before zeroing out, so no
> + * ptr get produced in the meantime, because this could
> + * result in waking even though the ptr_ring is full.
> + * The order of the operations is ensured by barrier().
> + */
> + will_invalidate = __ptr_ring_will_invalidate(&q->ring);
> + if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + dev = rcu_dereference(q->tap)->dev;
> + txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, q->queue_index);
> + stopped = netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq);
> + }
> + barrier();
> + __ptr_ring_discard_one(&q->ring, will_invalidate);
> +
> + if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> + if (stopped)
> + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +
> + array[i++] = ptr;
> + if (i >= n)
> + break;
> + } while ((ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&q->ring)));
> + spin_unlock(&q->ring.consumer_lock);
> +
> + return i;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tap_ring_consume_batched);
> +
> struct ptr_ring *tap_get_ptr_ring(struct file *file)
> {
> struct tap_queue *q;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 682df8157b55..7566b22780fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -3759,6 +3759,60 @@ struct socket *tun_get_socket(struct file *file)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tun_get_socket);
>
> +int tun_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + struct tun_file *tfile = file->private_data;
> + struct netdev_queue *txq;
> + struct net_device *dev;
> + bool will_invalidate;
> + bool stopped;
> + void *ptr;
> + int i;
> +
> + spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> + ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&tfile->tx_ring);
> +
> + if (!ptr) {
> + spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + i = 0;
> + do {
> + /* Check if the queue stopped before zeroing out, so no
> + * ptr get produced in the meantime, because this could
> + * result in waking even though the ptr_ring is full.
> + * The order of the operations is ensured by barrier().
> + */
> + will_invalidate =
> + __ptr_ring_will_invalidate(&tfile->tx_ring);
> + if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + dev = rcu_dereference(tfile->tun)->dev;
> + txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev,
> + tfile->queue_index);
> + stopped = netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq);
> + }
> + barrier();
> + __ptr_ring_discard_one(&tfile->tx_ring, will_invalidate);
> +
> + if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> + if (stopped)
> + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +
> + array[i++] = ptr;
> + if (i >= n)
> + break;
> + } while ((ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&tfile->tx_ring)));
> + spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> +
> + return i;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tun_ring_consume_batched);
> +
> struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *file)
> {
> struct tun_file *tfile;
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_tap.h b/include/linux/if_tap.h
> index 553552fa635c..2e5542d6aef4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_tap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_tap.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ struct socket;
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TAP)
> struct socket *tap_get_socket(struct file *);
> struct ptr_ring *tap_get_ptr_ring(struct file *file);
> +int tap_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file, void **array, int n);
> #else
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> @@ -22,6 +23,11 @@ static inline struct ptr_ring *tap_get_ptr_ring(struct file *f)
> {
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> +static inline int tap_ring_consume_batched(struct file *f,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_TAP */
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_tun.h b/include/linux/if_tun.h
> index 80166eb62f41..5b41525ac007 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_tun.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_tun.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct tun_msg_ctl {
> #if defined(CONFIG_TUN) || defined(CONFIG_TUN_MODULE)
> struct socket *tun_get_socket(struct file *);
> struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *file);
> +int tun_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file, void **array, int n);
>
> static inline bool tun_is_xdp_frame(void *ptr)
> {
> @@ -55,6 +56,12 @@ static inline struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *f)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> +static inline int tun_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool tun_is_xdp_frame(void *ptr)
> {
> return false;
> --
> 2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists