[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68d2d480.a70a0220.1b52b.02b4.GAE@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:10:24 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+d36d5ae81e1b0a53ef58@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Forwarded: [PATCH] bpf: fix NULL pointer dereference in print_reg_state()
For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org.
***
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: fix NULL pointer dereference in print_reg_state()
Author: listout@...tout.xyz
#syz test
Syzkaller reported a general protection fault due to a NULL pointer
dereference in print_reg_state() when accessing reg->map_ptr without
checking if it is NULL.
The existing code assumes reg->map_ptr is always valid before
dereferencing reg->map_ptr->name, reg->map_ptr->key_size, and
reg->map_ptr->value_size.
Fix this by adding explicit NULL checks before accessing reg->map_ptr
and its members. This prevents crashes when reg->map_ptr is NULL,
improving the robustness of the BPF verifier's verbose logging.
Reported-by: syzbot+d36d5ae81e1b0a53ef58@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Brahmajit Das <listout@...tout.xyz>
---
kernel/bpf/log.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
index 38050f4ee400..14c0a442a85b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
@@ -715,11 +715,10 @@ static void print_reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
verbose_a("ref_obj_id=%d", reg->ref_obj_id);
if (type_is_non_owning_ref(reg->type))
verbose_a("%s", "non_own_ref");
- if (type_is_map_ptr(t)) {
+ if (type_is_map_ptr(t) && reg->map_ptr) {
if (reg->map_ptr->name[0])
verbose_a("map=%s", reg->map_ptr->name);
- verbose_a("ks=%d,vs=%d",
- reg->map_ptr->key_size,
+ verbose_a("ks=%d,vs=%d", reg->map_ptr->key_size,
reg->map_ptr->value_size);
}
if (t != SCALAR_VALUE && reg->off) {
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists