[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNLnBbSr5BGDvmsG@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:29:25 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/imx: dc: Add DPR channel support
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 10:07:57AM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> Display Prefetch Resolve Channel(DPRC) is a part of a prefetch engine.
> It fetches display data, transforms it to linear format and stores it
> to DPRC's RTRAM. PRG, as the other part of a prefetch engine, acts as
> a gasket between the RTRAM controller and a FetchUnit. Add a platform
> driver to support the DPRC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Manage clocks with bulk interfaces. (Frank)
> - Sort variables in probe function in reverse Christmas tree fashion. (Frank)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/Makefile | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-dprc.c | 465 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-dprc.h | 35 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-drv.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-prg.c | 12 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-prg.h | 4 +
> 8 files changed, 522 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
...
> +
> +static void dc_dprc_reset(struct dc_dprc *dprc)
> +{
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, SYSTEM_CTRL0 + SET, SOFT_RESET);
> + fsleep(20);
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, SYSTEM_CTRL0 + CLR, SOFT_RESET);
> + fsleep(20);
> +}
> +
> +static void dc_dprc_enable(struct dc_dprc *dprc)
> +{
> + dc_prg_enable(dprc->prg);
> +}
> +
> +static void dc_dprc_reg_update(struct dc_dprc *dprc)
> +{
> + dc_prg_reg_update(dprc->prg);
> +}
> +
> +static void dc_dprc_enable_ctrl_done_irq(struct dc_dprc *dprc)
> +{
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&dprc->lock);
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, IRQ_MASK + CLR, IRQ_DPR_CRTL_DONE);
> +}
> +
> +void dc_dprc_configure(struct dc_dprc *dprc, unsigned int stream_id,
> + unsigned int width, unsigned int height,
> + unsigned int stride,
> + const struct drm_format_info *format,
> + dma_addr_t baddr, bool start)
> +{
> + unsigned int prg_stride = width * format->cpp[0];
> + unsigned int bpp = format->cpp[0] * 8;
> + struct device *dev = dprc->dev;
> + unsigned int p1_w, p1_h;
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (start) {
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get RPM: %d\n", ret);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + dc_dprc_set_stream_id(dprc, stream_id);
> + }
> +
> + p1_w = round_up(width, format->cpp[0] == 2 ? 32 : 16);
> + p1_h = round_up(height, 4);
> +
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, FRAME_CTRL0, PITCH(stride));
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, FRAME_1P_CTRL0, BYTE_1K);
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, FRAME_1P_PIX_X_CTRL, NUM_X_PIX_WIDE(p1_w));
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, FRAME_1P_PIX_Y_CTRL, NUM_Y_PIX_HIGH(p1_h));
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, FRAME_1P_BASE_ADDR_CTRL0, baddr);
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, FRAME_PIX_X_ULC_CTRL, CROP_ULC_X(0));
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, FRAME_PIX_Y_ULC_CTRL, CROP_ULC_Y(0));
> +
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, RTRAM_CTRL0, THRES_LOW(3) | THRES_HIGH(7));
Is it okay to access register if start is false since
pm_runtime_resume_and_get() have not called.
> +
> + val = LINE4 | BUF2;
> + switch (format->format) {
> + case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888:
> + /*
> + * It turns out pixel components are mapped directly
> + * without position change via DPR processing with
> + * the following color component configurations.
> + * Leave the pixel format to be handled by the
> + * display controllers.
> + */
> + val |= A_COMP_SEL(3) | R_COMP_SEL(2) |
> + G_COMP_SEL(1) | B_COMP_SEL(0);
> + val |= PIX_SIZE_32BIT;
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_err(dev, "unsupported format 0x%08x\n", format->format);
> + return;
> + }
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, MODE_CTRL0, val);
> +
> + if (start) {
> + /* software shadow load for the first frame */
> + val = SW_SHADOW_LOAD_SEL | SHADOW_LOAD_EN;
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, SYSTEM_CTRL0, val);
> +
> + /* and then, run... */
> + val |= RUN_EN | REPEAT_EN;
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, SYSTEM_CTRL0, val);
> + }
> +
> + dc_prg_configure(dprc->prg, width, height, prg_stride, bpp, baddr, start);
> +
> + dc_dprc_enable(dprc);
> +
> + dc_dprc_reg_update(dprc);
> +
> + if (start)
> + dc_dprc_enable_ctrl_done_irq(dprc);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "w: %u, h: %u, s: %u, fmt: 0x%08x\n",
> + width, height, stride, format->format);
> +}
> +
> +void dc_dprc_disable_repeat_en(struct dc_dprc *dprc)
> +{
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, SYSTEM_CTRL0 + CLR, REPEAT_EN);
> + dev_dbg(dprc->dev, "disable REPEAT_EN\n");
> +}
> +
> +void dc_dprc_disable(struct dc_dprc *dprc)
> +{
> + dc_prg_disable(dprc->prg);
> +
> + pm_runtime_put(dprc->dev);
You call pm_runtime_put() in dc_dprc_disable(), but not call
pm_runtime_resume_and_get() at dc_dprc_enable().
Is it more reasonable to call pm_runtime_resume_and_get() in dc_dprc_enable()
dc_dprc_enable()
{
...
pm_runtime_resume_and_get();
}
dc_dprc_configure()
{
unconditional call
pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
...
pm_runtime_put()
if (start) //look like only need enable when start is true
dc_dprc_enable(dprc);
}
> +
> + dev_dbg(dprc->dev, "disable\n");
> +}
> +
> +void dc_dprc_disable_at_boot(struct dc_dprc *dprc)
> +{
> + dc_prg_disable_at_boot(dprc->prg);
> +
> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(dprc->num_clks, dprc->clks);
> +
you have runtime functions dc_dprc_runtime_suspend()
If runtime pm status is correct, needn't call clk_bulk_disable_unprepare().
Look like call pm_runtime_put() here to let runtime pm management clks.
otherwise, runtime pm state will not match clock enable/disable state.
> + dev_dbg(dprc->dev, "disable at boot\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void dc_dprc_ctrl_done_handle(struct dc_dprc *dprc)
> +{
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, SYSTEM_CTRL0, REPEAT_EN);
> +
> + dc_prg_shadow_enable(dprc->prg);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dprc->dev, "CTRL done handle\n");
> +}
> +
...
> +
> +static int dc_dprc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct dc_dprc *dprc;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + int ret, wrap_irq;
> +
> + dprc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dprc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dprc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&dprc->ipc_handle);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get SCU ipc handle\n");
> +
> + base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, &res);
> + if (IS_ERR(base))
> + return PTR_ERR(base);
> +
> + dprc->reg = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &dc_dprc_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(dprc->reg))
> + return PTR_ERR(dprc->reg);
> +
> + wrap_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "dpr_wrap");
> + if (wrap_irq < 0)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + dprc->num_clks = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &dprc->clks);
> + if (dprc->num_clks < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, dprc->num_clks, "failed to get clocks\n");
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "fsl,sc-resource", &dprc->sc_resource);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get SC resource %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + dprc->prg = dc_prg_lookup_by_phandle(dev, "fsl,prgs", 0);
> + if (!dprc->prg)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER,
> + "failed to lookup PRG\n");
> +
> + dc_prg_set_dprc(dprc->prg, dprc);
> +
> + dprc->dev = dev;
> + spin_lock_init(&dprc->lock);
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, wrap_irq, dc_dprc_wrap_irq_handler,
> + IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), dprc);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to request dpr_wrap IRQ(%d): %d\n",
> + wrap_irq, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, dprc);
> +
> + ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to enable PM runtime\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dc_dprc_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct dc_dprc *dprc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(dprc->num_clks, dprc->clks);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dc_dprc_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct dc_dprc *dprc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(dprc->num_clks, dprc->clks);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable clocks: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + dc_dprc_reset(dprc);
> +
> + /* disable all control IRQs and enable all error IRQs */
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&dprc->lock);
> + regmap_write(dprc->reg, IRQ_MASK, IRQ_CTRL_MASK);
write one 32bit register is atomic, look like needn't spinlock.
Only other place use dprc->lock is in dc_dprc_enable_ctrl_done_irq(), which
write 32bit clr register.
Frank
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
...
> +void dc_prg_set_dprc(struct dc_prg *prg, struct dc_dprc *dprc)
> +{
> + prg->dprc = dprc;
> +}
> +
> +struct dc_dprc *dc_prg_get_dprc(struct dc_prg *prg)
> +{
> + return prg->dprc;
> +}
> +
> static int dc_prg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-prg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-prg.h
> index 6fd9b050bfa12334720f83ff9ceaf337e3048a54..f29d154f7de597b9d20d5e71303049f6f8b022d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-prg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-prg.h
> @@ -32,4 +32,8 @@ bool dc_prg_stride_supported(struct dc_prg *prg,
> struct dc_prg *
> dc_prg_lookup_by_phandle(struct device *dev, const char *name, int index);
>
> +void dc_prg_set_dprc(struct dc_prg *prg, struct dc_dprc *dprc);
> +
> +struct dc_dprc *dc_prg_get_dprc(struct dc_prg *prg);
> +
> #endif
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists