[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250923205740.qxtrpkbi6otowuin@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 23:57:40 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 phy 12/16] dt-bindings: phy: lynx-28g: add compatible
strings per SerDes and instantiation
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 03:37:31PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-28g.yaml:42:18: [error] string value is redundantly quoted with any quotes (quoted-strings)
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-28g.yaml:46:18: [error] string value is redundantly quoted with any quotes (quoted-strings)
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,lynx-28g.yaml:49:18: [error] string value is redundantly quoted with any quotes (quoted-strings)
>
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20250923194445.454442-13-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
>
> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
> should be noted in *this* patch.
>
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
>
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>
> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
>
Sorry, I literally didn't notice this warning even though it seems I am
also reproducing it locally.
I hope this doesn't mean the patch won't get reviewed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists