[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNMWhG5Ftu8ETYwk@aschofie-mobl2.lan>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:52:04 -0700
From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
CC: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, "Davidlohr
Bueso" <dave@...olabs.net>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>, "Fabio M.
De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>, Terry Bowman
<terry.bowman@....com>, Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] cxl/region: Add @range argument to function
cxl_calc_interleave_pos()
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 04:45:07PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> cxl_calc_interleave_pos() uses the endpoint decoder's HPA range to
> determine its interleaving position. This requires the endpoint
> decoders to be an SPA, which is not the case for systems that need
> address translation.
>
> Add a separate @range argument to function cxl_calc_interleave_pos()
> to specify the address range. Now it is possible to pass the SPA
> translated address range of an endpoint decoder to function
> cxl_calc_interleave_pos().
>
> Patch is a prerequisite to implement address translation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 8ccc171ac724..106692f1e310 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -1844,11 +1844,11 @@ static int find_pos_and_ways(struct cxl_port *port, struct range *range,
> * Return: position >= 0 on success
> * -ENXIO on failure
> */
> -static int cxl_calc_interleave_pos(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled)
> +static int cxl_calc_interleave_pos(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled,
> + struct range *range)
> {
> struct cxl_port *iter, *port = cxled_to_port(cxled);
> struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = cxled_to_memdev(cxled);
> - struct range *range = &cxled->cxld.hpa_range;
> int parent_ways = 0, parent_pos = 0, pos = 0;
> int rc;
Will this work? Change the assignment rather than adding a parameter:
- struct range *range = &cxled->cxld.hpa_range;
+ struct range *range = &cxled->cxld.region->hpa_range;
>
> @@ -1909,7 +1909,7 @@ static int cxl_region_sort_targets(struct cxl_region *cxlr)
> for (i = 0; i < p->nr_targets; i++) {
> struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled = p->targets[i];
>
> - cxled->pos = cxl_calc_interleave_pos(cxled);
> + cxled->pos = cxl_calc_interleave_pos(cxled, &cxlr->hpa_range);
> /*
> * Record that sorting failed, but still continue to calc
> * cxled->pos so that follow-on code paths can reliably
> @@ -2093,7 +2093,7 @@ static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled = p->targets[i];
> int test_pos;
>
> - test_pos = cxl_calc_interleave_pos(cxled);
> + test_pos = cxl_calc_interleave_pos(cxled, &cxlr->hpa_range);
> dev_dbg(&cxled->cxld.dev,
> "Test cxl_calc_interleave_pos(): %s test_pos:%d cxled->pos:%d\n",
> (test_pos == cxled->pos) ? "success" : "fail",
> --
> 2.39.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists