[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNJKsO4vv_FnBSOe@gpd4>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:22:24 +0200
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] sched_ext: Fix stray scx_root usage in
task_can_run_on_remote_rq()
On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 03:32:42PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> task_can_run_on_remote_rq() takes @sch but it is using scx_root when
> incrementing SCX_EV_DISPATCH_LOCAL_DSQ_OFFLINE, which is inconsistent and
> gets in the way of implementing multiple scheduler support. Use @sch
> instead. As currently scx_root is the only possible scheduler instance, this
> doesn't cause any behavior changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Good catch.
Acked-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index df433f6fab4b..5801ac676d59 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -1622,8 +1622,7 @@ static bool task_can_run_on_remote_rq(struct scx_sched *sch,
>
> if (!scx_rq_online(rq)) {
> if (enforce)
> - __scx_add_event(scx_root,
> - SCX_EV_DISPATCH_LOCAL_DSQ_OFFLINE, 1);
> + __scx_add_event(sch, SCX_EV_DISPATCH_LOCAL_DSQ_OFFLINE, 1);
> return false;
> }
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
-Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists