[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86cy7h1nva.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:09:45 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sven Peter <sven@...nel.org>,
Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/26] genirq: Add support for percpu_devid IRQ affinity
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:00:16 +0100,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 09:28:07AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > This is the third version of this series, originally posted at [1],
> > which aims at allowing percpu_devid interrupt requests on the basis of
> > an affinity mask. See the original submission for the details of why
> > this is a desirable outcome.
>
> FWIW, I backported this to 6.12 and tested it on a DT-based Android
> device with heterogeneous PMUs and pNMI enabled. Perf appears to work
> correctly, the pNMIs are configured as expected and the affinities
> all look good to me.
>
> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Awesome, thanks a lot for that and for the help getting this thing up
and running!
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists