lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175862671323.1039471.10731453002758041713.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 13:25:13 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Stefan Binding <sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Support reading Subsystem ID from Device Tree

On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:37:10 +0100, Stefan Binding wrote:
> In PC systems using ACPI, the driver is able to read back an SSID from
> the _SUB property. This SSID uniquely identifies the system, which
> enables the driver to read the correct firmware and tuning for that
> system from linux-firmware. Currently there is no way of reading this
> property from device tree. Add an equivalent property in device tree
> to perform the same role.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: cirrus,cs35l41: Document the cirrus,subsystem-id property
      commit: f8673e4069b2032bf9f854bae818a7bdbdca7520
[2/2] ASoC: cs35l41: Fallback to reading Subsystem ID property if not ACPI
      commit: 46c8b4d2a693eca69a2191436cffa44f489e98c7

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ