lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b75dckankcx55gbm734a23rvqxdbprlus3nkvqfry7lz5ksjf@jjmfsbiwqny6>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 22:10:52 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
        Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krishna Manikandan <quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/msm/dsi: support DSC configurations with
 slice_per_pkt > 1

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 11:08:10PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> Some panels support multiple slice to be sent in a single DSC packet. And

s/support/require/

If the panel supports something, then we can omit that and send 1 slice
as we currently do. If the panel requires multiple slices, it's
mandatory.

> this feature is a must for specific panels, such as JDI LPM026M648C. Add a

A panel driver which executes this API is appreciated. Otherwise in a
few months / years somebody will submit a patch 'field foo is not used
by the kernel drivers, drop it'.

> dsc_slice_per_pkt member into struct mipi_dsi_device and support the
> feature in msm mdss driver.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
>  include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h         |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> index f297e3de8c3dc4e1326e70c78c046b5a19568cef..de51cb02f267205320c5a94fc4188413e05907e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct msm_dsi_host {
>  
>  	struct drm_display_mode *mode;
>  	struct drm_dsc_config *dsc;
> +	unsigned int dsc_slice_per_pkt;
>  
>  	/* connected device info */
>  	unsigned int channel;
> @@ -849,17 +850,10 @@ static void dsi_update_dsc_timing(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_cmd_mod
>  	slice_per_intf = dsc->slice_count;
>  
>  	total_bytes_per_intf = dsc->slice_chunk_size * slice_per_intf;
> -	bytes_per_pkt = dsc->slice_chunk_size; /* * slice_per_pkt; */
> +	bytes_per_pkt = dsc->slice_chunk_size * msm_host->dsc_slice_per_pkt;
>  
>  	eol_byte_num = total_bytes_per_intf % 3;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Typically, pkt_per_line = slice_per_intf * slice_per_pkt.
> -	 *
> -	 * Since the current driver only supports slice_per_pkt = 1,
> -	 * pkt_per_line will be equal to slice per intf for now.
> -	 */
> -	pkt_per_line = slice_per_intf;
> +	pkt_per_line = slice_per_intf / msm_host->dsc_slice_per_pkt;
>  
>  	if (is_cmd_mode) /* packet data type */
>  		reg = DSI_COMMAND_COMPRESSION_MODE_CTRL_STREAM0_DATATYPE(MIPI_DSI_DCS_LONG_WRITE);
> @@ -1008,12 +1002,8 @@ static void dsi_timing_setup(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi)
>  		else
>  			/*
>  			 * When DSC is enabled, WC = slice_chunk_size * slice_per_pkt + 1.
> -			 * Currently, the driver only supports default value of slice_per_pkt = 1
> -			 *
> -			 * TODO: Expand mipi_dsi_device struct to hold slice_per_pkt info
> -			 *       and adjust DSC math to account for slice_per_pkt.
>  			 */
> -			wc = msm_host->dsc->slice_chunk_size + 1;
> +			wc = msm_host->dsc->slice_chunk_size * msm_host->dsc_slice_per_pkt + 1;
>  
>  		dsi_write(msm_host, REG_DSI_CMD_MDP_STREAM0_CTRL,
>  			DSI_CMD_MDP_STREAM0_CTRL_WORD_COUNT(wc) |
> @@ -1623,8 +1613,13 @@ static int dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>  	msm_host->lanes = dsi->lanes;
>  	msm_host->format = dsi->format;
>  	msm_host->mode_flags = dsi->mode_flags;
> -	if (dsi->dsc)
> +	if (dsi->dsc) {
>  		msm_host->dsc = dsi->dsc;
> +		msm_host->dsc_slice_per_pkt = dsi->dsc_slice_per_pkt;
> +		/* for backwards compatibility, assume 1 if not set */
> +		if (!msm_host->dsc_slice_per_pkt)
> +			msm_host->dsc_slice_per_pkt = 1;

msm_host->dsc_slice_per_pkt = dsi->dsc_slice_per_pkt ?: 1;

Yes, I think it's more ideomatic.

> +	}
>  
>  	ret = dsi_dev_attach(msm_host->pdev);
>  	if (ret)
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> index 6d2c08e8110151a97620389197f1ef79c058329d..5a85ba01f402a3866b70828391bb417bb8dd5956 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device_info {
>   * be set to the real limits of the hardware, zero is only accepted for
>   * legacy drivers
>   * @dsc: panel/bridge DSC pps payload to be sent
> + * @dsc_slice_per_pkt: number of DSC slices to be sent as in a single packet

s/as //

>   */
>  struct mipi_dsi_device {
>  	struct mipi_dsi_host *host;
> @@ -196,6 +197,7 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device {
>  	unsigned long hs_rate;
>  	unsigned long lp_rate;
>  	struct drm_dsc_config *dsc;
> +	unsigned int dsc_slice_per_pkt;

Why is it a part of the DSI device config? What if a device specifies
dsc_slice_per_pkt, but not DSC config? What are the legit boundaries for
this field?

>  };
>  
>  /**
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ