[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250924090330.7748Aaf-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:03:30 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] s390: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to
alloc_workqueue() users
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 05:38:56PM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> This patchset is the first stone on a refactoring needed in order to
> address the points aforementioned; it will have a positive impact also
> on the cpu isolation, in the long term, moving away percpu workqueue in
> favor to an unbound model.
...
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - New in the series, 2/3: arch/s390/kernel/hiperdispatch.c does not benefit from
> system_wq: this has been converted directly to system_unbound_wq.
> - the others system_wq users are converted to system_percpu_wq in patch 3/3
>
>
> Marco Crivellari (3):
> drivers/s390: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
> s390/diag324: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
> s390: replace use of system_wq with system_dfl_wq
>
> arch/s390/kernel/diag/diag324.c | 4 ++--
> arch/s390/kernel/hiperdispatch.c | 2 +-
> drivers/s390/char/tape_3590.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Series applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists