[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17dabd83-0849-44c9-b4a2-196af60d9676@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:13:18 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
usamaarif642@...il.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, ziy@...dia.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, baohua@...nel.org, voidice@...il.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, cerasuolodomenico@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
kaleshsingh@...gle.com, npache@...hat.com, riel@...riel.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, rppt@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com,
dev.jain@....com, ryncsn@...il.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
surenb@...gle.com, hughd@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
matthew.brost@...el.com, joshua.hahnjy@...il.com, rakie.kim@...com,
byungchul@...com, gourry@...rry.net, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com,
apopple@...dia.com, qun-wei.lin@...iatek.com, Andrew.Yang@...iatek.com,
casper.li@...iatek.com, chinwen.chang@...iatek.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, ioworker0@...il.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/thp: fix MTE tag mismatch when replacing
zero-filled subpages
On 24.09.25 10:50, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 10:49:27AM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>> On 2025/9/24 00:14, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> So alternative patch that also fixes the deferred struct page init (on
>>> the assumptions that the zero page is always mapped as pte_special():
>>
>> I can confirm that this alternative patch also works correctly; my tests
>> for MTE all pass ;)
>
> Thanks Lance for testing. I'll post one of the variants today.
>
>> This looks like a better fix since it solves the boot hang issue too.
>
> In principle, yes, until I tracked down why I changed it in the first
> place - 68d54ceeec0e ("arm64: mte: Allow PTRACE_PEEKMTETAGS access to
> the zero page"). ptrace() can read tags from PROT_MTE mappings and we
> want to allow reading zeroes as well if the page points to the zero
> page. Not flagging the page as PG_mte_tagged caused issues.
>
> I can change the logic in the ptrace() code, I just need to figure out
> what happens to the huge zero page. Ideally we should treat both in the
> same way but, AFAICT, we don't use pmd_mkspecial() on the huge zero
> page, so it gets flagged with PG_mte_tagged.
I changed that recently :) The huge zero folio will now always have
pmd_special() set.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists