[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250924093934.GC28073@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:39:34 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@...fvision.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
Matthias Fend <matthias.fend@...end.at>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Paul Elder <paul.elder@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] ACPI: property: Rework
acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint()
Hi Sakari,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 10:45:49AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Rework the code obtaining the next endpoint in
> acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(). The resulting code removes unnecessary
> contitionals and should be easier to follow.
>
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/property.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> index 3e85900080ac..5438592dc136 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> @@ -1399,14 +1399,15 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(
> if (!port)
> return NULL;
>
> - endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, prev);
> - while (!endpoint) {
> - port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port);
> - if (!port)
> + do {
> + endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, prev);
> + if (endpoint)
> break;
> +
> + port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port);
> if (is_acpi_graph_node(port, "port"))
> - endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, NULL);
> - }
> + prev = NULL;
Isn't there an issue here ? If the next subnode of fwnode is not a port,
the next iteration of the do loop will attempt to get an endpoint from
that non-port node. Maybe the acpi_get_next_subnode() that will try to
get the endpoint from the non-port port will return NULL because prev
won't be a child of port, but that seems fragile.
I think the following would be easier to understand:
do {
endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, prev);
if (endpoint)
break;
prev = NULL;
do {
port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port);
} while (port && !is_acpi_graph_node(port, "port"));
} while (port);
> + } while (port);
>
> /*
> * The names of the endpoint nodes begin with "endpoint@" followed by
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists