linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/17] objtool: Function validation tracing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250924105813.GI3419281@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:58:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/17] objtool: Function validation tracing

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:52:35PM +0200, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
> 
> On 9/24/25 12:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:08:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 09:42:06AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > >    d051:  perf_get_x86_pmu_capability+0x51    | xchg   %ax,%ax
> > > 
> > > That libopcode is 'funny', isn't that typically spelled "nop" ?
> > 
> > Ooh, I see, it is "osp nop" and yeah binutils also seems to do that as
> > "xchg %ax,%ax".
> 
> Yes, "xchg %ax,%ax" is NOP2 (opcodes: 0x66 0x90), "nop" is NOP1 (0x90).
> 
> That's one more improvement we can do: identify NOP instructions and
> display them as NOP<n>

Right, I have just the function for that. Let me do a patch for you.