[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250924130654.nnliddqiug5hkbsh@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 16:06:54 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>
Cc: "linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 phy 15/16] phy: lynx-28g: truly power the lanes up or
down
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 10:09:26AM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
> Unbounded loop, perhaps use timeout.
>
> This can fail on unbalanced calls as you discovered,
> but also e.g. when a pll is unstable.
>
> See below for when this came up previously:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240218-lynx28g-infinite-loop-v1-1-59cc5cef8367@solid-run.com/
Ok, I can make this a 17-patch set, no problem.
What happened to your patch? Did it get lost? Do you mind if I write a
new one myself, with a single read_poll_timeout() call for both
LNaTRSTCTL and LNaRRSTCTL, to keep the functionality same as before?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists