[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ad26663-a3cc-4bf4-9d6f-8213ac8e8ce6@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:04:46 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@...il.com>,
andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, matttbe@...nel.org, martineau@...nel.org,
geliang@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, hawk@...nel.org,
linux@...danrome.com, ameryhung@...il.com, toke@...hat.com,
houtao1@...wei.com, emil@...alapatis.com, yatsenko@...a.com,
isolodrai@...a.com, a.s.protopopov@...il.com, dxu@...uu.xyz,
memxor@...il.com, vmalik@...hat.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, tj@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, paul@...l-moore.com,
bboscaccy@...ux.microsoft.com, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
mrpre@....com, jakub@...udflare.com
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, david.hunter.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: Prepare to add -Wsign-compare for
bpf tests
On 9/25/25 12:35 PM, Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa wrote:
> -Change only variable types for correct sign comparisons
>
> Signed-off-by: Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@...il.com>
Pls write some better commit messages and not just copy/paste the same $subj/
message every time; proper sentences w/o the weird " -" indent. Also say why
this is needed in the commit message, and add a reference to the commit which
initially added this as a TODO, i.e. 495d2d8133fd ("selftests/bpf: Attempt to
build BPF programs with -Wsign-compare"). If you group these, then maybe also
include the parts of the compiler-emitted warnings during build which are
relevant to the code changes you do here.
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_loop.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c | 4 ++--
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c | 4 ++--
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c | 5 +++--
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c
> index 67a77944ef29..12ad0ec91021 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static __always_inline int handle_ipv4(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct bpf_dynptr *xd
> struct vip vip = {};
> int dport;
> __u32 csum = 0;
> - int i;
> + size_t i;
>
> __builtin_memset(eth_buffer, 0, sizeof(eth_buffer));
> __builtin_memset(iph_buffer_tcp, 0, sizeof(iph_buffer_tcp));
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_loop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_loop.c
> index 93267a68825b..e9b7bbff5c23 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_loop.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_loop.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static __always_inline int handle_ipv4(struct xdp_md *xdp)
> struct vip vip = {};
> int dport;
> __u32 csum = 0;
> - int i;
> + size_t i;
>
> if (iph + 1 > data_end)
> return XDP_DROP;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c
> index fad94e41cef9..85ef3c0a3e20 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_noinline.c
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ bool encap_v4(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct ctl_value *cval,
>
> next_iph_u16 = (__u16 *) iph;
> __pragma_loop_unroll_full
> - for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(struct iphdr) >> 1; i++)
> + for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(struct iphdr) >> 1; i++)
> csum += *next_iph_u16++;
> iph->check = ~((csum & 0xffff) + (csum >> 16));
> if (bpf_xdp_adjust_head(xdp, (int)sizeof(struct iphdr)))
> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ int send_icmp_reply(void *data, void *data_end)
> iph->check = 0;
> next_iph_u16 = (__u16 *) iph;
> __pragma_loop_unroll_full
> - for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(struct iphdr) >> 1; i++)
> + for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(struct iphdr) >> 1; i++)
> csum += *next_iph_u16++;
> iph->check = ~((csum & 0xffff) + (csum >> 16));
> return swap_mac_and_send(data, data_end);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
> index 44190efcdba2..f99957773c3a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
> @@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ __u64 uretprobe_multi_func_3_result = 0;
>
> __u64 uprobe_multi_sleep_result = 0;
>
> -int pid = 0;
> +__u32 pid = 0;
> int child_pid = 0;
> int child_tid = 0;
> int child_pid_usdt = 0;
> int child_tid_usdt = 0;
>
> -int expect_pid = 0;
> +__u32 expect_pid = 0;
> bool bad_pid_seen = false;
> bool bad_pid_seen_usdt = false;
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c
> index 8fbcd69fae22..017f1859ebe8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <stddef.h>
> #include "bpf_kfuncs.h"
> #include "bpf_misc.h"
>
> @@ -10,8 +11,8 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>
> int pid = 0;
>
> -int idx_entry = 0;
> -int idx_return = 0;
> +size_t idx_entry = 0;
> +size_t idx_return = 0;
>
> __u64 test_uprobe_cookie_entry[6];
> __u64 test_uprobe_cookie_return[3];
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c
> index 75dd922e4e9f..72f9f8c23c93 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c
> @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ int loop_inside_iter_volatile_limit(const void *ctx)
> {
> struct bpf_iter_num it;
> int *v, sum = 0;
> - __u64 i = 0;
> + __s32 i = 0;
>
> bpf_iter_num_new(&it, 0, ARR2_SZ);
> while ((v = bpf_iter_num_next(&it))) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists