[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNVufDmHjLRauKYo@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 12:31:56 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>, robh@...nel.org,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: add device_link support
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 12:00:41AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Shift the device dependency handling to the driver core by adding
> support for devlinks.
>
> The link between the consumer device and the dmaengine device is
> established by the consumer via the dma_request_chan() automatically if
> the dmaengine driver supports it (create_devlink flag set).
>
> By adding the devlink support it is ensured that the supplier can't be
> removed while the consumer still uses the dmaengine. Furthermore it
> ensures that the supplier driver is present and actual bound before the
> consumer is uses the supplier.
>
> Additional PM and runtime-PM dependency handling can be added easily too
> by setting the required flags (not implemented by this commit).
>
> The new create_devlink flag controlls the devlink creation to not cause
> any regressions with existing dmaengine drivers. This flag can be
> removed once all drivers are successfully tested to support devlinks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
> ---
Add previous discussion link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/aLhUv+mtr1uZTCth@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810/
Another thread
https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20250801120007.GB4906@pendragon.ideasonboard.com/
Add Laurent Pinchart, who may instest this topic also.
Add Rob Herring, who may know why dma engine can't create dev_link default
like other provider (clk, phy, gpio ...)
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/dmaengine.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index 758fcd0546d8bde8e8dddc6039848feeb1e24475..e81985ab806ae87ff3aa4739fe6f6328b2587f2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -858,6 +858,21 @@ struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev, const char *name)
> /* No functional issue if it fails, users are supposed to test before use */
> #endif
>
> + /*
> + * Devlinks between the dmaengine device and the consumer device
> + * are optional till all dmaengine drivers are converted/tested.
> + */
> + if (chan->device->create_devlink) {
> + struct device_link *dl;
> +
> + dl = device_link_add(dev, chan->device->dev, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER);
I suggest link to per channel device, instead dma engine devices.
chan->dev->device like phy drivers because some dma-engine have per channel
resources, like power domain and clocks.
Frank
> + if (!dl) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n",
> + dev_name(chan->device->dev));
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> + }
> +
> chan->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "dma:%s", name);
> if (!chan->name)
> return chan;
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> index bb146c5ac3e4ccd7bc0afbf3b28e5b3d659ad62f..c67737a358df659f2bf050a9ccb8d23b17ceb357 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -817,6 +817,8 @@ struct dma_filter {
> * DMA tansaction with no software intervention for reinitialization.
> * Zero value means unlimited number of entries.
> * @descriptor_reuse: a submitted transfer can be resubmitted after completion
> + * @create_devlink: create a devlink between a dma_chan_dev supplier and
> + * dma-channel consumer device
> * @residue_granularity: granularity of the transfer residue reported
> * by tx_status
> * @device_alloc_chan_resources: allocate resources and return the
> @@ -894,6 +896,7 @@ struct dma_device {
> u32 max_burst;
> u32 max_sg_burst;
> bool descriptor_reuse;
> + bool create_devlink;
> enum dma_residue_granularity residue_granularity;
>
> int (*device_alloc_chan_resources)(struct dma_chan *chan);
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists