linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: Add stdbool.h to nolibc includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f1c699e2-a371-42f0-931a-554ab0027c5f@t-8ch.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 18:49:59 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel-dev@...lia.com, 
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: Add stdbool.h to nolibc includes

On 2025-09-25 17:24:18+0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 06:15:07PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> 
> > As mentioned in the other subthread I'm fine with this.
> > How urgent is this fix? Can it wait until my regular PR for -rc1?
> > If not, who is going to send it to Linus?
> 
> It's pretty urgent, this is a build break for at least the arm64
> selftests in -next due to the commit I mentioned with a fixes tag which
> is in the tip tree.

I pushed it into the nolibc for-next branch and will include it in my
6.18-rc1 PR in a few days. Let me know if this is insufficient.

Thomas