lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250926-ima-audit-v1-1-64d75fdc8fdc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 01:45:06 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, 
 Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, 
 Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>, 
 Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
Cc: Frank Dinoff <fdinoff@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ima: add dont_audit action to suppress audit actions

"measure", "appraise" and "hash" actions all have corresponding "dont_*"
actions, but "audit" currently lacks that. This means it is not
currently possible to have a policy that audits everything by default,
but excludes specific cases.

This seems to have been an oversight back when the "audit" action was
added.

Add a corresponding "dont_audit" action to enable such uses.

Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
---
 Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy |  2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c  | 14 +++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
index c2385183826c..5d548dd2c6e7 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Description:
 		  rule format: action [condition ...]
 
 		  action: measure | dont_measure | appraise | dont_appraise |
-			  audit | hash | dont_hash
+			  audit | dont_audit | hash | dont_hash
 		  condition:= base | lsm  [option]
 			base:	[[func=] [mask=] [fsmagic=] [fsuuid=] [fsname=]
 				[uid=] [euid=] [gid=] [egid=]
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 128fab897930..c5bad3a0c43a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #define APPRAISE	0x0004	/* same as IMA_APPRAISE */
 #define DONT_APPRAISE	0x0008
 #define AUDIT		0x0040
+#define DONT_AUDIT	0x0080
 #define HASH		0x0100
 #define DONT_HASH	0x0200
 
@@ -1064,7 +1065,7 @@ void ima_update_policy(void)
 enum policy_opt {
 	Opt_measure, Opt_dont_measure,
 	Opt_appraise, Opt_dont_appraise,
-	Opt_audit, Opt_hash, Opt_dont_hash,
+	Opt_audit, Opt_dont_audit, Opt_hash, Opt_dont_hash,
 	Opt_obj_user, Opt_obj_role, Opt_obj_type,
 	Opt_subj_user, Opt_subj_role, Opt_subj_type,
 	Opt_func, Opt_mask, Opt_fsmagic, Opt_fsname, Opt_fsuuid,
@@ -1086,6 +1087,7 @@ static const match_table_t policy_tokens = {
 	{Opt_appraise, "appraise"},
 	{Opt_dont_appraise, "dont_appraise"},
 	{Opt_audit, "audit"},
+	{Opt_dont_audit, "dont_audit"},
 	{Opt_hash, "hash"},
 	{Opt_dont_hash, "dont_hash"},
 	{Opt_obj_user, "obj_user=%s"},
@@ -1478,6 +1480,14 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 
 			entry->action = AUDIT;
 			break;
+		case Opt_dont_audit:
+			ima_log_string(ab, "action", "dont_audit");
+
+			if (entry->action != UNKNOWN)
+				result = -EINVAL;
+
+			entry->action = DONT_AUDIT;
+			break;
 		case Opt_hash:
 			ima_log_string(ab, "action", "hash");
 
@@ -2097,6 +2107,8 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_dont_appraise));
 	if (entry->action & AUDIT)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_audit));
+	if (entry->action & DONT_AUDIT)
+		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_dont_audit));
 	if (entry->action & HASH)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_hash));
 	if (entry->action & DONT_HASH)

-- 
2.51.0.536.g15c5d4f767-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ