lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kdpj4yddikjg2cvd7pyzf55udaqrttlyhuwmupmhvrn4jxdjw4@q6pajmr5f3i4>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 17:07:22 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Wei <wei.liu@....qualcomm.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com, namcao@...utronix.de, 
	zhiqiang.tu@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: gpio-keys - fix misleading GPIO number

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:25:29PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 8:49 AM Wei <wei.liu@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@....qualcomm.com>
> >
> > The error log prints button->gpio, which is unset and default to 0
> > in non-legacy configurations, leading to misleading messages.
> >
> > Use desc_to_gpio() to report the actual global GPIO number.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@....qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> > index f9db86da0818..243295a3ea1d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> > @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int gpio_keys_setup_key(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >                                 error = irq;
> >                                 dev_err_probe(dev, error,
> >                                               "Unable to get irq number for GPIO %d\n",
> > -                                             button->gpio);
> > +                                             desc_to_gpio(bdata->gpiod));
> 
> That's technically a legacy interface.
> 
> Can we just not mention the GPIO number?

Yes, there was a patch removing printing this number... We are losing
debug context though.

> 
> The only thing that would actually make sense in this kind
> of errors is if we add some new interface like:
> 
> const char * get_gpiod_debug_string(gpiod);

I assume the char will be dynamically allocated. Freeing it will be
PITA.

I see vsprintf() has %pC for printing clocks and %pg for block devices,
maybe we could have %pGD or similar for GPIO descriptors?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ