[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14df3870-6cb1-4e5d-9c4d-bb8acef8c594@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 10:01:37 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com,
tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com, trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com,
yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add support for CAMCC for
Kaanapali
On 25/09/2025 09:46, Taniya Das wrote:
>> BIST == Built In Self Test ?
>>
>> Can this not just be put into one camcc header ?
> These are two different clock controllers CAMCC and CAM_BIST_MCLK they
> should not be in the same header.
BIST means Built In Self Test ?
Is this really something to be upstreamed ?
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists