[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250925094205.GC836419@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 10:42:05 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, xfr@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Convert open-coded register
polling to helper macro
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 11:22:17PM +0800, Furong Xu wrote:
> Drop the open-coded register polling routines.
> Use readl_poll_timeout_atomic() in atomic state.
>
> Compile tested only.
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
I agree this is correct. Or at least, it looks correct to me.
But, FWIIW, I do have some hesitation about untested code of this nature
being accepted so close to the merge window.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists