[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb46cc46-f177-4cc7-b0d0-c7970d8d7a6d@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 12:12:41 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Cover ID_AA64ISAR3_EL1 in
set_id_regs
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 07:29:49PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > ---
> > base-commit: 5db15c998c390efbe5c82f6cda77cb896a3a6a3e
> $ git show 5db15c998c390efbe5c82f6cda77cb896a3a6a3e
> fatal: bad object 5db15c998c390efbe5c82f6cda77cb896a3a6a3e
> What's the point of indicating a base commit if that's not something I
> can find? You should never base any work on top of something that
> isn't a stable tag.
This was due to you having applied the LSFE patch but that application
not yet being visible to me at the time I did the rebase (I've noticed
occasional slow mirroring on kernel.org recently, possibly it was that),
I needed to base on the already applied patch so that I could check that
the test binary worked properly.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists