[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6823295.MDQidcC6GM@benoit.monin>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 13:51:37 +0200
From: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@...tlin.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
Sari Khoury <sari.khoury@...ileye.com>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 08/19] clk: divider: check divider validity for
CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN_INTEGERS
On Saturday, 20 September 2025 at 07:15:45 CEST, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Benoît Monin (2025-09-03 05:47:15)
> > Ensure that the divider is even when the flag CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN_INTEGERS
> > is set, similar to the power of two check for CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO.
> >
>
> Is this a fix?
>
This was found during code review, nothing prevents divider_get_val() to
compute an odd divider, but we have not hit a bug caused by that.
Should I add a Fixes tag to
6a136805e3c15 ("clk: divider: IntroduceCLK_DIVIDER_EVEN_INTEGERS flag")
or drop this patch since it does not fix a bug per se?
Best regards,
--
Benoît Monin, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists