[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d548b14e-ae28-4807-9b29-9961543ea549@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 15:15:46 +0300
From: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, Michael Guralnik
<michaelgur@...dia.com>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@...lanox.com>, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>, Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V5] net/mlx5: Improve write-combining test
reliability for ARM64 Grace CPUs
On 9/25/2025 2:54 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 02:48:33PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> +static void mlx5_iowrite64_copy(struct mlx5_wc_sq *sq, __be32 mmio_wqe[16],
>> + size_t mmio_wqe_size, unsigned int offset)
>> +{
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON) && defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> IS_ENABLED() not defined()
I just wonder why, Is there a preference in the driver from like
aesthetic/convention point of view?
Since here it technically doesnt matter - IS_ENABLED have no functional
difference from defined since these are boolean configs not
*tristate*ones (cant be loaded as module).
Patrisious.
>
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists