[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h3r8PKU6Q1bL0yr1seuVH3HRrdBa9-+x5eQUuU0CsYkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 20:31:48 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] PM: hibernate: Combine return paths in power_down()
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 8:29 PM Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 9/26/25 11:41 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > To avoid code duplication and improve clarity, combine the code
> > paths in power_down() leading to a return from that function.
> >
> > No intentional functional impact.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The actual change looks fine to me.
>
> Since it's used in "both" a success and failure path would you consider
> using "wakeup" for the label instead of "rollback"? Or anything else
> you can think of that doesn't have a connotation of failure.
Sure, "exit" comes to mind for instance.
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@...nel.org>
Thanks!
> > ---
> > kernel/power/hibernate.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > @@ -708,21 +708,11 @@ static void power_down(void)
> > if (hibernation_mode == HIBERNATION_SUSPEND) {
> > pm_restore_gfp_mask();
> > error = suspend_devices_and_enter(mem_sleep_current);
> > - if (error) {
> > - hibernation_mode = hibernation_ops ?
> > - HIBERNATION_PLATFORM :
> > - HIBERNATION_SHUTDOWN;
> > - } else {
> > - /* Match pm_restore_gfp_mask() call in hibernate() */
> > - pm_restrict_gfp_mask();
> > + if (!error)
> > + goto rollback;
> >
> > - /* Restore swap signature. */
> > - error = swsusp_unmark();
> > - if (error)
> > - pr_err("Swap will be unusable! Try swapon -a.\n");
> > -
> > - return;
> > - }
> > + hibernation_mode = hibernation_ops ? HIBERNATION_PLATFORM :
> > + HIBERNATION_SHUTDOWN;
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > @@ -733,12 +723,9 @@ static void power_down(void)
> > case HIBERNATION_PLATFORM:
> > error = hibernation_platform_enter();
> > if (error == -EAGAIN || error == -EBUSY) {
> > - /* Match pm_restore_gfp_mask() in hibernate(). */
> > - pm_restrict_gfp_mask();
> > - swsusp_unmark();
> > events_check_enabled = false;
> > pr_info("Wakeup event detected during hibernation, rolling back.\n");
> > - return;
> > + goto rollback;
> > }
> > fallthrough;
> > case HIBERNATION_SHUTDOWN:
> > @@ -757,6 +744,15 @@ static void power_down(void)
> > pr_crit("Power down manually\n");
> > while (1)
> > cpu_relax();
> > +
> > +rollback:
> > + /* Match the pm_restore_gfp_mask() call in hibernate(). */
> > + pm_restrict_gfp_mask();
> > +
> > + /* Restore swap signature. */
> > + error = swsusp_unmark();
> > + if (error)
> > + pr_err("Swap will be unusable! Try swapon -a.\n");
> > }
> >
> > static int load_image_and_restore(void)
> >
> >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists