lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f016d47f-919c-2944-ab8f-68e450e5836a@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 12:13:53 +0530
From: Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
        konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mukesh.savaliya@....qualcomm.com, anup.kulkarni@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk: Add firmware-name to
 QUPv3 nodes



On 9/25/2025 2:22 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9/25/25 6:26 AM, Viken Dadhaniya wrote:
>> Traditionally, firmware loading for Serial Engines (SE) in the QUP hardware
>> of Qualcomm SoCs has been managed by TrustZone (TZ). While this approach
>> ensures secure SE assignment and access control, it limits flexibility for
>> developers who need to enable various protocols on different SEs.
>>
>> Add the firmware-name property to QUPv3 nodes in the device tree to enable
>> firmware loading from the Linux environment. Handle SE assignments and
>> access control permissions directly within Linux, removing the dependency
>> on TrustZone.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
> 
> Viken, you've posted a lot of patches like these lately for
> specific boards.
> 
> Should we instead push this to the SoC DTSI, to limit the boilerplate?

The firmware load from Linux feature is applicable only to devkit boards
(RB3 Gen2 and EVK), and therefore, it is being added exclusively to the
board-specific device tree files.

> 
> If I recall correctly, you said these ELFs are not vendor-signed, so
> it should be OK to have them be assigned globally
> 

This feature is intended solely for use with the development kit and is not
intended for commercialization. Therefore, vendor sign-off is currently not
applicable.

> Konrad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ