[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DD2KKUEVR7P1.TFVYX7PES9FS@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 09:56:25 +0200
From: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>, "Andrew Lunn"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric
Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, "Paolo
Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof
Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, "Claudiu Beznea"
<claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Harini Katakam" <harini.katakam@...inx.com>, "Richard Cochran"
<richardcochran@...il.com>, "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Thomas Petazzoni"
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, "Tawfik Bayouk"
<tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, "Sean Anderson" <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 0/5] net: macb: various fixes
On Tue Sep 23, 2025 at 6:00 PM CEST, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> This would have been a RESEND if it wasn't for that oneline RCT fix.
> Rebased and tested on the latest net/main as well, still working fine
> on EyeQ5 hardware.
>
> Fix a few disparate topics in MACB:
>
> [PATCH net v6 1/5] dt-bindings: net: cdns,macb: allow tsu_clk without tx_clk
> [PATCH net v6 2/5] net: macb: remove illusion about TBQPH/RBQPH being per-queue
> [PATCH net v6 3/5] net: macb: move ring size computation to functions
> [PATCH net v6 4/5] net: macb: single dma_alloc_coherent() for DMA descriptors
> [PATCH net v6 5/5] net: macb: avoid dealing with endianness in macb_set_hwaddr()
What's the state of maintainers minds for this series? It has been
stable for some time, tested on sam9x75 (by Nicolas Ferre) & EyeQ5
and Simon Horman has added his reviewed-by this morning (thanks!).
But of course I am biased.
I am asking because merging would benefit my pending series.
Thanks,
--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists