[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250926083841.74621-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 10:38:40 +0200
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] wifi: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
system_unbound_wq should be the default workqueue so as not to enforce
locality constraints for random work whenever it's not required.
Adding system_dfl_wq to encourage its use when unbound work should be used.
The old system_unbound_wq will be kept for a few release cycles.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
---
net/wireless/core.c | 4 ++--
net/wireless/sysfs.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/core.c b/net/wireless/core.c
index 797f9f2004a6..93b8e18ca630 100644
--- a/net/wireless/core.c
+++ b/net/wireless/core.c
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static void cfg80211_wiphy_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (wk) {
list_del_init(&wk->entry);
if (!list_empty(&rdev->wiphy_work_list))
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, work);
+ queue_work(system_dfl_wq, work);
spin_unlock_irq(&rdev->wiphy_work_lock);
trace_wiphy_work_run(&rdev->wiphy, wk);
@@ -1698,7 +1698,7 @@ void wiphy_work_queue(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wiphy_work *work)
list_add_tail(&work->entry, &rdev->wiphy_work_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdev->wiphy_work_lock, flags);
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &rdev->wiphy_work);
+ queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &rdev->wiphy_work);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wiphy_work_queue);
diff --git a/net/wireless/sysfs.c b/net/wireless/sysfs.c
index 62f26618f674..8d142856e385 100644
--- a/net/wireless/sysfs.c
+++ b/net/wireless/sysfs.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int wiphy_resume(struct device *dev)
if (rdev->wiphy.registered && rdev->ops->resume)
ret = rdev_resume(rdev);
rdev->suspended = false;
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &rdev->wiphy_work);
+ queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &rdev->wiphy_work);
wiphy_unlock(&rdev->wiphy);
if (ret)
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists