linux-kernel - [PATCH v8 mm-new 10/12] selftests/bpf: add test case to update THP policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250926093343.1000-11-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 17:33:41 +0800
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	david@...hat.com,
	ziy@...dia.com,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
	npache@...hat.com,
	ryan.roberts@....com,
	dev.jain@....com,
	hannes@...xchg.org,
	usamaarif642@...il.com,
	gutierrez.asier@...wei-partners.com,
	willy@...radead.org,
	ast@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	ameryhung@...il.com,
	rientjes@...gle.com,
	corbet@....net,
	21cnbao@...il.com,
	shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
	tj@...nel.org,
	lance.yang@...ux.dev
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 mm-new 10/12] selftests/bpf: add test case to update THP policy

This test case exercises the BPF THP update mechanism by modifying an
existing policy. The behavior confirms that:
- EBUSY error occurs when attempting to install a new BPF program while
  another is active
- Updates to currently running programs are successfully processed

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/thp_adjust.c     | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_thp_adjust.c     | 14 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/thp_adjust.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/thp_adjust.c
index b14f57040654..72b2ec31025a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/thp_adjust.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/thp_adjust.c
@@ -208,6 +208,27 @@ static void subtest_thp_eligible(void)
 	bpf_link__destroy(ops_link);
 }
 
+static void subtest_thp_policy_update(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_link *old_link, *new_link;
+	int err;
+
+	old_link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.swap_ops);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(old_link, "attach_old_link"))
+		return;
+
+	new_link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.thp_eligible_ops);
+	if (!ASSERT_NULL(new_link, "attach_new_link"))
+		goto destory_old;
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, EBUSY, "attach_new_link");
+
+	err = bpf_link__update_map(old_link, skel->maps.thp_eligible_ops);
+	ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "update_old_link");
+
+destory_old:
+	bpf_link__destroy(old_link);
+}
+
 static int thp_adjust_setup(void)
 {
 	int err = -1, pmd_order;
@@ -253,6 +274,8 @@ void test_thp_adjust(void)
 
 	if (test__start_subtest("thp_eligible"))
 		subtest_thp_eligible();
+	if (test__start_subtest("policy_update"))
+		subtest_thp_policy_update();
 
 	thp_adjust_destroy();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_thp_adjust.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_thp_adjust.c
index ed8c510693a0..8f3bc4768edc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_thp_adjust.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_thp_adjust.c
@@ -39,3 +39,17 @@ SEC(".struct_ops.link")
 struct bpf_thp_ops thp_eligible_ops = {
 	.thp_get_order = (void *)thp_eligible,
 };
+
+SEC("struct_ops/thp_get_order")
+int BPF_PROG(alloc_not_in_swap, struct vm_area_struct *vma, enum tva_type tva_type,
+	     unsigned long orders)
+{
+	if (tva_type == TVA_SWAP_PAGEFAULT)
+		return 0;
+	return -1;
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_thp_ops swap_ops = {
+	.thp_get_order = (void *)alloc_not_in_swap,
+};
-- 
2.47.3