lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f685f02d-9faa-4d76-b9ad-35f2fee0ebe1@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 12:45:38 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Ayushi Makhija <quic_amakhija@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...il.com, sean@...rly.run,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, andersson@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
        neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
        Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se,
        jernej.skrabec@...il.com, quic_rajeevny@...cinc.com,
        quic_vproddut@...cinc.com, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs8300: add Display Serial
 Interface device nodes

On 9/26/25 11:25 AM, Ayushi Makhija wrote:
> On 9/26/2025 3:32 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 11:06:01AM +0530, Ayushi Makhija wrote:
>>> Add device tree nodes for the DSI0 controller with their corresponding
>>> PHY found on Qualcomm QCS8300 SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ayushi Makhija <quic_amakhija@...cinc.com>
>>> ---

[...]

>>> +			mdss_dsi0_phy: phy@...4400 {
>>> +				compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-dsi-phy-5nm";
>>
>> Add qcs8300-specific compatible and use sa8775p as a fallback
>>
> 
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> I have one doubt, even though the ctrl and phy versions for sa8775p(LeMans) and qcs8300(Monaco) are same.
> Why can't we use the same compatible string that we have used for LeMans ctrl and phy ? what is the need to define a separate
> compatible string for monaco ctrl and phy ?

Because they're different SoCs and if it turns out there's e.g.
a silicon bug specific to monaco, we can apply a quirk to just
monaco this way

Konrad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ