[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250926033255.10930-1-kartikey406@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 09:02:54 +0530
From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>
To: muchun.song@...ux.dev,
osalvador@...e.de,
david@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>,
syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] hugetlbfs: skip VMAs without shareable locks in hugetlb_vmdelete_list
hugetlb_vmdelete_list() uses trylock to acquire VMA locks during truncate
operations. As per the original design in commit 40549ba8f8e0 ("hugetlb:
use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization"), if the trylock fails
or the VMA has no lock, it should skip that VMA. Any remaining mapped
pages are handled by remove_inode_hugepages() which is called after
hugetlb_vmdelete_list() and uses proper lock ordering to guarantee
unmapping success.
Currently, when hugetlb_vma_trylock_write() returns success (1) for VMAs
without shareable locks, the code proceeds to call unmap_hugepage_range().
This causes assertion failures in huge_pmd_unshare() → hugetlb_vma_assert_locked()
because no lock is actually held:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 6594 Comm: syz.0.28 Not tainted
Call Trace:
hugetlb_vma_assert_locked+0x1dd/0x250
huge_pmd_unshare+0x2c8/0x540
__unmap_hugepage_range+0x6e3/0x1aa0
unmap_hugepage_range+0x32e/0x410
hugetlb_vmdelete_list+0x189/0x1f0
Fix by using goto to ensure locks acquired by trylock are always released, even
when skipping VMAs without shareable locks.
Reported-by: syzbot+f26d7c75c26ec19790e7@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f26d7c75c26ec19790e7
Fixes: 40549ba8f8e0 ("hugetlb: use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization")
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Use goto to unlock after trylock, avoiding lock leaks (Andrew Morton)
- Add comment explaining why non-shareable VMAs are skipped (Andrew Morton)
---
fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
index 9e0625167517..9fa7c72ac1a6 100644
--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -488,6 +488,14 @@ hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cached *root, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end,
if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma))
continue;
+ /*
+ * Skip VMAs without shareable locks. Per the design in commit
+ * 40549ba8f8e0, these will be handled by remove_inode_hugepages()
+ * called after this function with proper locking.
+ */
+ if (!__vma_shareable_lock(vma))
+ goto skip;
+
v_start = vma_offset_start(vma, start);
v_end = vma_offset_end(vma, end);
@@ -498,7 +506,8 @@ hugetlb_vmdelete_list(struct rb_root_cached *root, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end,
* vmas. Therefore, lock is not held when calling
* unmap_hugepage_range for private vmas.
*/
- hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
+skip:
+ hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
}
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists