[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250928152030.GA136019@ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 17:20:30 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, x86@...nel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Magnus Lindholm <linmag7@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] dma-mapping: remove unused map_page callback
Hi Leon.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 05:17:25PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Leon.
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 06:02:29PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> >
> > After conversion of arch code to use physical address mapping,
> > there are no users of .map_page() and .unmap_page() callbacks,
> > so let's remove them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/dma-map-ops.h | 7 -------
> > kernel/dma/mapping.c | 12 ------------
> > kernel/dma/ops_helpers.c | 8 +-------
> > 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> It looks like you missed a few sparc32 bits:
They were included, but the patch is named sparc64,
which is why I missed it.
If you could rename the patch that would be nice.
Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists