[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250928162029.GA3121@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 18:20:29 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] documentation: seqlock: fix the wrong documentation of
read_seqbegin_or_lock/need_seqretry
The comments and pseudo code in Documentation/locking/seqlock.rst are wrong:
int seq = 0;
do {
read_seqbegin_or_lock(&foo_seqlock, &seq);
/* ... [[read-side critical section]] ... */
} while (need_seqretry(&foo_seqlock, seq));
read_seqbegin_or_lock() always returns with an even "seq" and need_seqretry()
doesn't change this counter. This means that seq is always even and thus the
locking pass is simply impossible.
IOW, "_or_lock" has no effect and this code doesn't differ from
do {
seq = read_seqbegin(&foo_seqlock);
/* ... [[read-side critical section]] ... */
} while (read_seqretry(&foo_seqlock, seq));
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
Documentation/locking/seqlock.rst | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/locking/seqlock.rst b/Documentation/locking/seqlock.rst
index ec6411d02ac8..167d442d3c7f 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/seqlock.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/seqlock.rst
@@ -218,13 +218,14 @@ Read path, three categories:
according to a passed marker. This is used to avoid lockless readers
starvation (too much retry loops) in case of a sharp spike in write
activity. First, a lockless read is tried (even marker passed). If
- that trial fails (odd sequence counter is returned, which is used as
- the next iteration marker), the lockless read is transformed to a
- full locking read and no retry loop is necessary::
+ that trial fails (sequence counter doesn't match), make the marker
+ odd for the next iteration, the lockless read is transformed to a
+ full locking read and no retry loop is necessary, for example::
/* marker; even initialization */
- int seq = 0;
+ int seq = 1;
do {
+ seq++; /* 2 on the 1st/lockless path, otherwise odd */
read_seqbegin_or_lock(&foo_seqlock, &seq);
/* ... [[read-side critical section]] ... */
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
Powered by blists - more mailing lists