| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7577871f-06be-492d-b6d7-8404d7a045e0@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 10:49:43 -0700
From: jane.chu@...cle.com
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Luis Chamberlain
<mcgrof@...nel.org>,
syzbot <syzbot+e6367ea2fdab6ed46056@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linmiaohe@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
nao.horiguchi@...il.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING in memory_failure
On 9/29/2025 10:29 AM, jane.chu@...cle.com wrote:
>
> On 9/29/2025 4:08 AM, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
>>>
>>> I want to change all the split functions in huge_mm.h and provide
>>> mapping_min_folio_order() to try_folio_split() in
>>> truncate_inode_partial_folio().
>>>
>>> Something like below:
>>>
>>> 1. no split function will change the given order;
>>> 2. __folio_split() will no longer give VM_WARN_ONCE when provided
>>> new_order
>>> is smaller than mapping_min_folio_order().
>>>
>>> In this way, for an LBS folio that cannot be split to order 0, split
>>> functions will return -EINVAL to tell caller that the folio cannot
>>> be split. The caller is supposed to handle the split failure.
>>
>> IIUC, we will remove warn on once but just return -EINVAL in
>> __folio_split()
>> function if new_order < min_order like this:
>> ...
>> min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
>> if (new_order < min_order) {
>> - VM_WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot split mapped folio below min-
>> order: %u",
>> - min_order);
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> ...
>
> Then the user process will get a SIGBUS indicting the entire huge page
> at higher order -
> folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
> if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, false) < 0) {
> res = -EHWPOISON;
> kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio);
> put_page(p);
> action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_UNSPLIT_THP, MF_FAILED);
> goto unlock_mutex;
> }
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(p), p);
> folio = page_folio(p);
>
> the huge page is not usable any way, kind of similar to the hugetlb page
> situation: since the page cannot be splitted, the entire page is marked
> unusable.
>
> How about keep the current huge page split code as is, but change the M-
> F code to recognize that in a successful splitting case, the poisoned
> page might just be in a lower folio order, and thus, deliver the SIGBUS ?
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index a24806bb8e82..342c81edcdd9 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2291,7 +2291,9 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> * page is a valid handlable page.
> */
> folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
> - if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, false) < 0) {
> + ret = try_to_split_thp_page(p, false);
> + folio = page_folio(p);
> + if (ret < 0 || folio_test_large(folio)) {
> res = -EHWPOISON;
> kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio);
> put_page(p);
> @@ -2299,7 +2301,6 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> goto unlock_mutex;
> }
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(p), p);
> - folio = page_folio(p);
> }
>
> thanks,
> -jane
Maybe this is better, in case there are other reason for
split_huge_page() to return -EINVAL.
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index a24806bb8e82..2bfa05acae65 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1659,9 +1659,10 @@ static int identify_page_state(unsigned long pfn,
struct page *p,
static int try_to_split_thp_page(struct page *page, bool release)
{
int ret;
+ int new_order = min_order_for_split(page_folio(page));
lock_page(page);
- ret = split_huge_page(page);
+ ret = split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, NULL, new_order);
unlock_page(page);
if (ret && release)
@@ -2277,6 +2278,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
folio_unlock(folio);
if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
+ int ret;
/*
* The flag must be set after the refcount is bumped
* otherwise it may race with THP split.
@@ -2291,7 +2293,9 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
* page is a valid handlable page.
*/
folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
- if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, false) < 0) {
+ ret = try_to_split_thp_page(p, false);
+ folio = page_folio(p);
+ if (ret < 0 || folio_test_large(folio)) {
res = -EHWPOISON;
kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio);
put_page(p);
@@ -2299,7 +2303,6 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
goto unlock_mutex;
}
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(p), p);
- folio = page_folio(p);
}
/*
@@ -2618,7 +2621,8 @@ static int soft_offline_in_use_page(struct page *page)
};
if (!huge && folio_test_large(folio)) {
- if (try_to_split_thp_page(page, true)) {
+ if ((try_to_split_thp_page(page, true)) ||
+ folio_test_large(page_folio(page))) {
pr_info("%#lx: thp split failed\n", pfn);
return -EBUSY;
}
thanks,
-jane
Powered by blists - more mailing lists