[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1176879373.438342.1759126465054.JavaMail.zimbra@couthit.local>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 11:44:25 +0530 (IST)
From: Parvathi Pudi <parvathi@...thit.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: andrew+netdev <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, davem <davem@...emloft.net>,
edumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, kuba <kuba@...nel.org>,
pabeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, danishanwar <danishanwar@...com>,
rogerq <rogerq@...nel.org>, pmohan <pmohan@...thit.com>,
basharath <basharath@...thit.com>, afd <afd@...com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
pratheesh <pratheesh@...com>, Prajith Jayarajan <prajith@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, praneeth <praneeth@...com>,
srk <srk@...com>, rogerq <rogerq@...com>,
krishna <krishna@...thit.com>, mohan <mohan@...thit.com>,
parvathi <parvathi@...thit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] RSTP SWITCH support for PRU-ICSSM Ethernet
driver
Hi,
>> No, this patch-set applies to both STP and RSTP. The driver and firmware
>> responds to the port-state transitions and FDB operations through the
>> standard Linux switchdev/bridge interfaces, with no STP/RSTP related
>> logic executed in driver/firmware.
>>
>> We referred to RSTP in the commit message as it is our primary use case
>> and it implies support for STP as well.
>
> I would not say RSTP implied STP, because the higher level
> implementation is very different. You need to know the low level
> details to understand they use the same driver API.
>
> Please generalise the commit messages, mention STP as well as RSTP.
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
Understood, we will update the commit message in the next version.
Thanks and Regards,
Parvathi.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists