[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNop4ZBrfuqrX40Y@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 23:40:33 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: syzbot <syzbot+359a67b608de1ef72f65@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, apopple@...dia.com, baohua@...nel.org,
byungchul@...com, cem@...nel.org, david@...morbit.com,
david@...hat.com, gourry@...rry.net, harry.yoo@...cle.com,
joshua.hahnjy@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
matthew.brost@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com,
penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, rakie.kim@...com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
willy@...radead.org, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, ziy@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING in xfs_init_fs_context
This looks like slub turning a < PAGE_SIZE allocation into a order > 0
folio allocation, which the page allocator then complains about.
We'll either need to make slab not propagate < PAGE_SIZE allocations
to order > 0 page allocation, or make the page allocator handle the
latter.
And XFS shouldn't need the NOFAIL allocation here, but this will break
things elsewhere as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists