lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <TY3PR01MB998368496A0A51E1C81FA47FD51BA@TY3PR01MB9983.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 07:23:04 +0000
From: "Kazuhiro Abe (Fujitsu)" <fj1078ii@...itsu.com>
To: 'Hanjun Guo' <guohanjun@...wei.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi
	<lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, "Rafael J.
 Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] ACPI: AGDI: Add interrupt signaling mode support

Hi Hanjun,

Thank you for your review.

> Hi Kazuhiro,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply, some comments below.
> 
> On 2025/9/5 12:27, Kazuhiro Abe wrote:
> > AGDI has two types of signaling modes: SDEI and interrupt.
> > Currently, the AGDI driver only supports SDEI.
> > Therefore, add support for interrupt signaling mode The interrupt
> > vector is retrieved from the AGDI table, and call panic function when
> > an interrupt occurs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kazuhiro Abe <fj1078ii@...jp.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > I keep normal IRQ code when NMI cannot be used.
> > If there is any concern, please let me know.
> >
> > v2->v3
> >   - Fix bug in the return value of agdi_probe function.
> >   - Remove unnecessary curly braces in the agdi_remove function.
> >
> > v2:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250829101154.2377800-1-fj1078ii@aa.jp.fu
> > jitsu.com/
> > v1->v2
> >   - Remove acpica update since there is no need to update define value
> >     for this patch.
> > ---
> >   drivers/acpi/arm64/agdi.c | 95
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >   1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/agdi.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/agdi.c
> > index e0df3daa4abf..2313a46f01cd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/agdi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/agdi.c
> > @@ -16,7 +16,11 @@
> >   #include "init.h"
> >
> >   struct agdi_data {
> > +	unsigned char flags;
> 
> Adding a comment here for what's the falgs used for, multi flags in this file such as
> irq_flags, just make the code easy to understand.

Understood.
I will add the following comment:
unsigned char flags; /* AGDI Signaling Mode (0=SDEI-based, 1=Interrupt-based) */

> 
> >   	int sdei_event;
> > +	unsigned int gsiv;
> > +	bool use_nmi;
> > +	int irq;
> >   };
> >
> >   static int agdi_sdei_handler(u32 sdei_event, struct pt_regs *regs,
> > void *arg) @@ -48,6 +52,55 @@ static int agdi_sdei_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev,
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +static irqreturn_t agdi_interrupt_handler_nmi(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > +	nmi_panic(NULL, "Arm Generic Diagnostic Dump and Reset NMI
> Interrupt event issued\n");
> > +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t agdi_interrupt_handler_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > +	panic("Arm Generic Diagnostic Dump and Reset Interrupt event
> issued\n");
> > +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int agdi_interrupt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +				struct agdi_data *adata)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long irq_flags;
> > +	int ret;
> > +	int irq;
> > +
> > +	irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, adata->gsiv, ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE,
> ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> > +	if (irq < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot register GSI#%d (%d)\n",
> adata->gsiv, irq);
> > +		return irq;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	irq_flags = IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN |
> > +		    IRQF_NO_THREAD;
> > +	/* try NMI first */
> > +	ret = request_nmi(irq, &agdi_interrupt_handler_nmi, irq_flags,
> > +			  "agdi_interrupt_nmi", NULL);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		ret = request_irq(irq, &agdi_interrupt_handler_irq,
> > +				  irq_flags, "agdi_interrupt_irq", NULL);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot register IRQ %d\n", ret);
> > +			acpi_unregister_gsi(adata->gsiv);
> > +			return ret;
> > +		}
> > +		enable_irq(irq);
> > +		adata->irq = irq;
> > +	} else {
> > +		enable_nmi(irq);
> > +		adata->irq = irq;
> > +		adata->use_nmi = true;
> > +	}
> 
> if (!ret) {
> 	/* NMI handling code */
> }
> 
> /* Then try normal interrupt */
> ret = request_irq();
> ...
> 
> This makes code better organized.

Understood. I will fix it for better organization as you suggested.


> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static int agdi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   {
> >   	struct agdi_data *adata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev); @@ -55,12
> > +108,15 @@ static int agdi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   	if (!adata)
> >   		return -EINVAL;
> >
> > -	return agdi_sdei_probe(pdev, adata);
> > +	if (adata->flags & ACPI_AGDI_SIGNALING_MODE)
> > +		return agdi_interrupt_probe(pdev, adata);
> > +	else
> > +		return agdi_sdei_probe(pdev, adata);
> >   }
> >
> > -static void agdi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static void agdi_sdei_remove(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +			     struct agdi_data *adata)
> >   {
> > -	struct agdi_data *adata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> >   	int err, i;
> >
> >   	err = sdei_event_disable(adata->sdei_event);
> > @@ -83,6 +139,29 @@ static void agdi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   			adata->sdei_event, ERR_PTR(err));
> >   }
> >
> > +static void agdi_interrupt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +				  struct agdi_data *adata)
> > +{
> > +	if (adata->irq != -1) {
> > +		if (adata->use_nmi)
> > +			free_nmi(adata->irq, NULL);
> > +		else
> > +			free_irq(adata->irq, NULL);
> > +
> > +		acpi_unregister_gsi(adata->gsiv);
> > +	}
> 
> if (adata->irq == -1)
> 	return;
> 
> ...
> 
> To save extra { }.

Understood. I will fix it as suggested.


> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void agdi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > +	struct agdi_data *adata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > +
> > +	if (adata->flags & ACPI_AGDI_SIGNALING_MODE)
> > +		agdi_interrupt_remove(pdev, adata);
> > +	else
> > +		agdi_sdei_remove(pdev, adata);
> > +}
> > +
> >   static struct platform_driver agdi_driver = {
> >   	.driver = {
> >   		.name = "agdi",
> > @@ -94,7 +173,7 @@ static struct platform_driver agdi_driver = {
> >   void __init acpi_agdi_init(void)
> >   {
> >   	struct acpi_table_agdi *agdi_table;
> > -	struct agdi_data pdata;
> > +	struct agdi_data pdata = {0};
> 
> struct agdi_data pdata = { 0 };

Understood, I'll do that.


Best Regards,
Kazuhiro Abe

> 
> Thanks
> Hanjun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ