[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250929093754.3998136-4-lihuisong@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:37:48 +0800
From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <lenb@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<Sudeep.Holla@....com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
<zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>, <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, <yubowen8@...wei.com>,
<lihuisong@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Return failure when get lpi_state->arch_flags failed
The architecture specific context loss flags is important for ARM.
And this flag is used to control the execution of different code
flows in acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter().
So it is better to return failure when get lpi_state->arch_flags
failed.
Fixes: a36a7fecfe60 ("ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states")
Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 681587f2614b..f36f9514b6c7 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -984,8 +984,11 @@ static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle,
if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 2, &lpi_state->flags))
lpi_state->flags = 0;
- if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 3, &lpi_state->arch_flags))
- lpi_state->arch_flags = 0;
+ if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 3, &lpi_state->arch_flags)) {
+ pr_err("Get architecture specific context loss flags failed.\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto end;
+ }
if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 4, &lpi_state->res_cnt_freq))
lpi_state->res_cnt_freq = 1;
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists